What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for Kraven the Hunter

Kraven the Hunter carries a 15% rating on Rotten Tomatoes’ Tomatometer, making it one of the most critically panned superhero films released in recent years.

This score is based on 160 professional reviews submitted following the film’s wide release in December 2024, and it represents a dramatic rejection of the Sony Pictures Entertainment film by the critical establishment.

The film began its Rotten Tomatoes journey with an 11% score on December 11, 2024, but additional reviews pushed it slightly upward to its current 15% rating—a modest improvement that still places it firmly in the territory of critical failure.

What makes Kraven’s critical reception particularly notable is the stark contrast between how critics and audiences responded to the film. While professional reviewers awarded it a paltry 15%, audiences gave the film a 72% rating on Rotten Tomatoes’ Popcornmeter, based on more than 2,500 verified viewer ratings.

This 57-point disparity is one of the largest disconnects between critics and general audiences in recent superhero cinema, indicating that viewers found considerably more entertainment value in the film than the professional critical community did. Understanding this gap requires examining both what critics disliked and what audiences responded to positively.

Table of Contents

• How Did Kraven the Hunter Perform on Rotten Tomatoes?
• The Critic Versus Audience Divide on Kraven’s Reception
• Where Does Kraven Rank in Sony’s Spider-Man Universe?
• Understanding the Significance of a 15% Critical Score in Modern Cinema
• What Kraven’s Rotten Tomatoes Score Reveals About the Film’s Critical Reception
• Comparing Kraven to Other Recent Underperforming Superhero Films
• What Kraven’s Critical Reception Signals for the Future of Sony’s Spider-Man Universe
• Conclusion

How Did Kraven the Hunter Perform on Rotten Tomatoes?

The 15% critical score on Rotten Tomatoes represents one of the lowest evaluations a major studio superhero film can receive while technically remaining slightly above the dreaded “rotten” threshold—though at 15%, the distinction between “rotten” and this marginal score is largely academic.

For context, Rotten Tomatoes uses the threshold of 60% to designate a film as “fresh,” meaning anything below that is officially classified as “rotten.” kraven‘s 15% score demonstrates just how thoroughly critics rejected the film’s execution, storytelling, and artistic vision.

The 160 reviews that contributed to this score came from a wide range of publications and critics, suggesting this wasn’t a case of a few influential voices skewing the aggregate—rather, the critical consensus was remarkably consistent in its assessment.

When the film first released on December 11, 2024, its initial 15% score quickly dropped to 11% as additional early reviews came in, before eventually settling back at 15% as the review pool stabilized.

This movement up and down during the initial review period is not uncommon with high-profile releases, where early reviews from major publications sometimes differ in their assessments from secondary and tertiary sources.

The fact that Kraven ended up higher than its lowest point (11%) could suggest that not all critics viewed the film identically, though the overall consensus clearly leaned toward finding the film unsuccessful.

The Critic Versus Audience Divide on Kraven’s Reception

The 57-point gap between Kraven’s 15% critical score and its 72% audience score is among the most dramatic disconnects in recent superhero cinema, and this disparity deserves careful examination.

A spread of this magnitude typically indicates one of several scenarios: critics may have found fundamental flaws in storytelling, character development, or technical execution that audiences were willing to overlook or didn’t notice; audiences may have had lower expectations or prioritized entertainment value differently than critics; or the film may contain specific elements that appeal strongly to general viewers but frustrate professional critics who evaluate films against broader artistic standards.

The 72% audience score, derived from 2,500+ verified rotten Tomatoes viewers, suggests that a meaningful majority of general audiences who paid to see Kraven found it at least moderately entertaining or worthwhile.

This is a crucial limitation to recognize when interpreting critical scores—critics and paying audiences often value different aspects of films.

A critic might spend their review focused on weak dialogue, inconsistent character motivation, or formulaic plot structure, while an audience member might primarily focus on action sequences, spectacle, or whether the film held their attention for its runtime. Both perspectives are valid, but they often lead to different conclusions about the same film.

Where Does Kraven Rank in Sony’s Spider-Man Universe?

Kraven the Hunter’s 15% critical score ties it with Morbius as one of the lowest-rated films in Sony’s Spider-Man Universe (SSU), a cinematic saga that has struggled to achieve critical consistency since its inception. The only film ranking lower within the SSU is Madame Web, which holds an 11% Tomatometer score on Rotten Tomatoes.

This comparison provides important context: Kraven is part of a franchise that has failed to achieve critical legitimacy as a whole, though some entries like Venom: Let There Be Carnage (58%) and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (97%) have managed respectable or strong critical receptions.

The pattern of SSU critical failure is worth noting for anyone evaluating Kraven. Sony Pictures has attempted to build a Marvel-adjacent universe without direct Spider-Man involvement, and the critical reception of films like Kraven, Morbius, and Madame Web suggests that audiences and critics are more skeptical of these peripheral characters when given standalone features.

Kraven’s 15% score, alongside Morbius’s similar failure, indicates that Sony’s approach to adapting lesser-known Spider-Man villains for theatrical releases has consistently missed the mark in the eyes of professional critics, even when audiences show moderate interest.

Understanding the Significance of a 15% Critical Score in Modern Cinema

A 15% Rotten Tomatoes score represents a thorough critical rejection that goes beyond mere disappointment. This score suggests that critics found the film fundamentally flawed across multiple dimensions—not just in one or two areas, but in a pervasive way that affected their overall assessment.

In practical terms, a 15% score means that roughly 85% of the reviewed critics gave the film a negative rating, while only about 15% found enough merit to recommend it.

For comparison, films that score in the 20-30% range often have isolated positive reviews from critics who found something worth praising; at 15%, even those small pockets of support nearly disappear.

The significance of this score extends beyond mere numbers. When a major studio film with a substantial budget receives a 15% critical rating, it signals to industry observers that the filmmaking process encountered serious problems—whether in the script, direction, editing, performances, or some combination thereof.

Industry insiders, fellow filmmakers, and serious film enthusiasts often pay attention to Rotten Tomatoes scores as barometers of critical opinion, and a 15% score marks the film as a cautionary example rather than a success worth studying or emulating.

However, it’s important to recognize this as a limitation of critical scores: they measure critical consensus, not objective quality or entertainment value, and some films with low critical scores have developed cult followings years later.

What Kraven’s Rotten Tomatoes Score Reveals About the Film’s Critical Reception

The specific reasons behind Kraven’s poor critical reception would require reading individual reviews, but several common criticisms typically appear in professional assessments of poorly-received superhero films: unclear character motivation, clichéd plot structure, weak dialogue, underdeveloped antagonist, or a disconnect between the film’s tone and its source material.

Critics of adaptations often focus heavily on whether the filmmakers understood and honored the core essence of the characters and stories they were adapting, and a 15% score suggests that Kraven failed this test in the eyes of most reviewers.

The warning here for potential viewers is that critically panned superhero films often have these fundamental structural problems that go beyond surface-level entertainment.

It’s worth noting that even within the poor critical reception, some reviewers likely found redeeming qualities worth mentioning. The handful of positive reviews that contributed to the 15% score probably praised specific elements like certain action sequences, individual performances, or technical aspects like cinematography or editing.

However, these isolated positive points were not enough to overcome the consensus that the film’s overall execution fell short. This limitation of aggregate scores is important to understand: a 15% score doesn’t mean every element was terrible, but rather that the balance of the film—its cumulative impact—was found wanting by critics.

Comparing Kraven to Other Recent Underperforming Superhero Films

Kraven’s 15% places it in company with some of the most critically panned superhero attempts of the past decade, including films like Fant4stic (2015, 9%), Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987, 8%), and Catwoman (2004, 9%).

While Kraven technically ranks higher than these notorious failures, the 15% score puts it in a tier just above the most infamous superhero films ever made.

This comparison is sobering: Kraven had the benefit of modern filmmaking technology, a substantial budget from a major studio, and the backdrop of a successful superhero universe; yet it still failed to achieve critical acceptance at a level that most industry professionals would consider respectable.

The comparison also reveals something about audience expectations. Films like Catwoman and Fant4stic both had significantly lower audience scores than Kraven (with Catwoman at 43% and Fant4stic at 9%), suggesting that Kraven’s 72% audience score is actually relatively strong compared to some other critically panned superhero films.

This indicates that whatever problems critics identified in Kraven, general audiences were more forgiving or found enough entertainment value to rate the experience positively. Understanding this distinction helps viewers decide whether critical consensus or audience response better aligns with their own priorities.

What Kraven’s Critical Reception Signals for the Future of Sony’s Spider-Man Universe

The consistent pattern of critical failure among Sony’s Spider-Man Universe films—with Kraven now joining Morbius and Madame Web as major critical disappointments—suggests that the studio may need to reconsider its approach to expanding this cinematic universe.

The 15% score on Kraven, combined with the similar failure of Morbius, indicates that critics are skeptical about Sony’s ability to translate lesser-known Spider-Man characters into compelling standalone films.

Future projects in this universe will likely be viewed through the lens of these repeated critical rejections, with audiences and critics alike approaching them with reduced expectations.

Looking forward, Sony faces a decision about whether to continue pursuing films centered on Spider-Man villains and peripheral characters, or to refocus its efforts on stories more directly connected to Spider-Man himself.

The 72% audience score for Kraven suggests there is an audience for these films, but the critical consensus raises questions about long-term sustainability and credibility.

The warning for fans of the Spider-Man universe is that, despite audience interest, critical legitimacy remains elusive for these SSU projects, and that may continue to impact production quality and studio investment.

Conclusion

Kraven the Hunter holds a 15% rating on Rotten Tomatoes’ Tomatometer, representing a thorough critical rejection based on 160 professional reviews. This score places the film among the lowest-rated entries in Sony’s Spider-Man Universe and indicates that critics found significant flaws across multiple aspects of the film’s execution.

The stark contrast between the 15% critical score and the 72% audience score reveals a fundamental disconnect in how professional critics and general viewers assessed the film, with audiences proving considerably more forgiving than the critical establishment.

Understanding Kraven’s Rotten Tomatoes score requires recognizing both what it tells us and what it doesn’t. The 15% score definitively indicates critical failure and places the film in the company of some of the most poorly reviewed superhero films in cinema history.

However, the film’s 72% audience score and commercial viability among viewers suggest that critical consensus alone doesn’t determine whether a film has entertainment value for general audiences.

For anyone considering whether to watch Kraven, the Rotten Tomatoes scores offer useful information but should be considered alongside personal taste, genre preferences, and tolerance for critically panned entertainment.

---

You Might Also Like

• What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for The Wild Robot
• What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for The Whale
• What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for The Fabelmans

Browse more: Box Office | Entertainment | Film | Movie News | Movies