The 2017 adaptation of Stephen King’s *It* earned an 85% Certified Fresh rating from critics on Rotten Tomatoes, paired with an impressive 89% audience approval score. This strong dual reception marked a significant success for Andy Muschietti’s horror film, which became one of the highest-grossing horror movies ever made.
The Fresh designation—which requires a score above 60%—indicates that the film was widely viewed as a positive entry in the horror genre, despite the inevitable critical discussions about pacing, character development, and faithfulness to King’s source material.
- Table of Contents
- How Critics Scored It 2017 on Rotten Tomatoes
- Audience Reception vs. Critical Response and What the 89% Reveals
- How It 2017 Compares to Other Stephen King Adaptations
- Understanding Rotten Tomatoes' Fresh Rating and Its Meaning for It 2017
- The Eleven-Point Gap Between Critics and Audiences and What It Signals
- Initial Reception and How Critical Views Have Shifted Over Time
- Why Rotten Tomatoes Scores Matter for Horror Films and What It 2017 Demonstrates
- Conclusion
- You Might Also Like
The split between the critics’ score and audience response tells an interesting story about how *It* resonated differently depending on perspective. While critics recognized technical achievement and effective scares, audiences connected more deeply with the film’s entertainment value and emotional beats.
For anyone evaluating the film’s overall critical standing, these Rotten Tomatoes scores represent the clearest metric for understanding whether the 2017 adaptation succeeded in delivering both critical legitimacy and audience satisfaction.
Table of Contents
- How Critics Scored It 2017 on Rotten Tomatoes
- Audience Reception vs. Critical Response and What the 89% Reveals
- How It 2017 Compares to Other Stephen King Adaptations
- Understanding Rotten Tomatoes’ Fresh Rating and Its Meaning for It 2017
- The Eleven-Point Gap Between Critics and Audiences and What It Signals
- Initial Reception and How Critical Views Have Shifted Over Time
- Why Rotten Tomatoes Scores Matter for Horror Films and What It 2017 Demonstrates
- Conclusion
How Critics Scored It 2017 on Rotten Tomatoes
The 85% critics score on rotten Tomatoes reflects broad critical approval with room for legitimate reservations.
This Certified Fresh rating came from a consensus that Muschietti delivered an effective horror adaptation that captured the fundamental scares of King’s novel while constructing a cohesive narrative arc.
Critics particularly praised the film’s visual design, the ensemble cast’s chemistry among the young actors, and its ability to balance supernatural horror with coming-of-age storytelling. The score, sitting comfortably above the 80% threshold that separates “generally favorable” from “universally praised,” suggests critics saw the film as solidly executed rather than groundbreaking.
However, the 85% score masks significant disagreement in critical circles. Some reviewers found the film overstuffed with plot elements, while others criticized the decision to split the story across two films as a commercial rather than artistic choice. The score represents an aggregate of these varied opinions rather than a unified verdict.
This is where Rotten Tomatoes becomes a limitation—it compresses complex critical discussion into a single percentage, obscuring whether a film scored 85% because most critics liked it moderately well or because strong advocates and strong detractors roughly balanced out.
Audience Reception vs. Critical Response and What the 89% Reveals
The 89% audience score represents an unusually strong endorsement from general moviegoers, and the four-point gap between critics and audiences is significant.
In horror films, this pattern typically suggests that audiences prioritized entertainment and emotional engagement over critical concerns about narrative structure or artistic ambition. The audience rating reflects *It*’s performance during opening weekends when dedicated King fans, horror enthusiasts, and general audiences all flocked to theaters, many of them satisfied with what they experienced.
This gap also indicates that the film succeeded in its primary commercial objective—delivering a scary, engaging experience that people wanted to recommend to others. One important caveat: Rotten Tomatoes audience scores measure only those who voluntarily rate the film on the platform, which skews toward engaged fans rather than casual viewers.
The 89% audience score therefore represents people invested enough in *It* to seek out and use the Rotten Tomatoes platform, not a scientific sampling of all ticket buyers.
This selection bias means the true general audience reaction—including those who saw it once and never thought about it again—might fall somewhere between the 85% critical score and the reported 89% audience figure.
How It 2017 Compares to Other Stephen King Adaptations
The 85% critics score positions *It* among the strongest Stephen King adaptations in modern cinema. By comparison, *The Shining* (1980) scores 84% on Rotten Tomatoes, while *Carrie* (1976) earns 93% from critics—though that latter film benefits from historical reassessment and decades of critical reevaluation.
Among contemporary King adaptations, *It* outperformed films like *The Dark Tower* (2017), which scored only 19%, and *Gerald’s Game* (2017), which earned 59%. This positioning suggests that Muschietti’s approach found the right balance for modern audiences and critics evaluating King material.
The 89% audience score, however, exceeds what many classic King adaptations achieved. The original *Stephen King’s It* (1990) miniseries, while beloved, was not typically reviewed on Rotten Tomatoes during its broadcast run.
This comparison matters because it shows that the 2017 film succeeded in adapting source material that previous generations found challenging to bring to screen.
The film essentially proved that King’s epic, character-driven narrative could work as theatrical cinema rather than just miniseries television, though critics remained divided on whether condensing 1,138 pages into roughly two hours was the right approach.
Understanding Rotten Tomatoes’ Fresh Rating and Its Meaning for It 2017
The Fresh designation on Rotten Tomatoes carries specific weight in how audiences interpret reviews. When a film earns the Fresh badge, it signals to potential viewers that the film has achieved a critical threshold of quality.
For *It* (2017), this Fresh rating meant that despite acknowledging flaws, the critical consensus held that the film was worth seeing for horror fans and King enthusiasts. This label likely influenced purchasing decisions, streaming selections, and DVD rentals in ways difficult to measure but significant in real-world impact.
The practical implication of the 85% score is that the film passed the legitimacy test. It wasn’t dismissed as a cynical cash grab or a failed adaptation. Instead, critics engaged with it seriously as a horror film that accomplished much of what it attempted.
For viewers using Rotten Tomatoes as a guide to what’s worth their time, this Fresh rating meant the film merited attention—though it also meant understanding that some critics had reservations worth considering before committing to a two-hour viewing experience.
The Eleven-Point Gap Between Critics and Audiences and What It Signals
The four-point spread between the 85% critics score and 89% audience score is relatively modest compared to many films, but it still reveals meaningful differences in how these groups evaluated *It*. This gap suggests that audiences were slightly more forgiving of narrative issues, pacing problems, or artistic compromises that critics noted.
Horror audiences often prioritize scare effectiveness and emotional payoff over structural elegance, and *It* appears to have delivered effectively on both fronts for viewers, even when critics noted the film’s occasional awkward exposition or overstuffed plotting.
However, one limitation to keep in mind: the absence of a larger critical-audience gap doesn’t mean consensus existed. Instead, it might simply mean that the film satisfied most people on their own terms, whether they were coming to it as serious critics or casual viewers wanting a good scare.
The real danger in over-interpreting this gap is assuming that the high audience score represents universal love—98% of people who rated the film gave it a positive review, yes, but that still means 2% out of every hundred found it significantly flawed. For a nearly three-hour horror film, that’s a meaningful minority dissent.
Initial Reception and How Critical Views Have Shifted Over Time
When *It* released in September 2017, the critical response was immediate and largely positive, though reviewers raised consistent concerns about the film’s length and structure. Within the first few weeks, the 85% score stabilized and has remained relatively constant, suggesting that early critic consensus held.
However, the film’s reputation has evolved in subsequent years as viewers revisited it through streaming, with many considering it a genuine milestone in horror cinema.
This long-term reassessment is a phenomenon Rotten Tomatoes doesn’t capture—a film’s score can remain unchanged while cultural perception shifts substantially. For example, some critics who initially gave *It* favorable reviews but with reservations now view it more generously when considering the landscape of horror adaptations that followed.
Films like *It Chapter Two* (2019), which scored only 63% from critics, made the 2017 entry look better in retrospect. This retrospective comparison effect is invisible in the static 85% score but represents an important reality about how audiences and critics actually think about films over time.
Why Rotten Tomatoes Scores Matter for Horror Films and What It 2017 Demonstrates
For horror films specifically, Rotten Tomatoes scores function differently than for other genres because critical standards for horror remain contested. A horror film earning 85% from critics accomplishes something significant—it proves that critics engaged with the film as art rather than dismissing it as mere entertainment.
Too often, horror films score significantly lower despite audience enthusiasm, which reflects lingering critical bias against the genre. *It* (2017) broke somewhat against that pattern, earning legitimacy from serious critics while maintaining audience enthusiasm.
Looking forward, the 85% critics score and 89% audience score for *It* established a benchmark for what successful modern horror adaptations might achieve. Subsequent Stephen King adaptations and horror films have been measured against these numbers, and few have matched this dual-score performance.
The film demonstrated that horror audiences and critics could align reasonably well when a film combined technical craft, source material respect, and genuine scares. For anyone evaluating contemporary horror cinema, understanding how *It* performed on Rotten Tomatoes provides essential context for assessing what audiences and critics value in the genre.
Conclusion
The Rotten Tomatoes scores for *It* (2017)—85% from critics and 89% from audiences—represent a significant achievement in horror cinema and Stephen King adaptations. These scores don’t indicate universal perfection or absence of legitimate criticism; rather, they confirm that Muschietti’s adaptation succeeded in delivering an engaging, frightening film that satisfied both critical standards and audience expectations.
The Fresh designation carries weight because it signals genuine approval rather than mere commercial success or guilty pleasure status.
For anyone considering whether to watch or rewatch *It* (2017), these Rotten Tomatoes scores provide useful guidance: expect a well-crafted horror film with strong performances and effective scares, while understanding that some viewers and critics have reservations about pacing, length, and narrative choices.
The scores reflect consensus, not unanimity, and engagement with the film itself remains the only way to determine whether the critical and audience perspectives align with your own viewing preferences.
You Might Also Like
- What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for The Conjuring
- What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for The Avengers
- What Is the Rotten Tomatoes Score for Star Wars The Force Awakens
