“Your Name” (Kimi no Na wa), Makoto Shinkai’s 2016 animated masterpiece, carries significant critical weight on Metacritic, though the exact numerical Metascore requires checking the site directly due to fluctuations in critic submissions and score calculations.
What we do know is that the film has accumulated 26 professional critic reviews on the platform, providing a substantial foundation for its critical reception rating.
- Metacritic Rating Name: Table of Contents
- How Metacritic Scores Work for Anime Films
- Understanding "Your Name" in the Anime Critical Landscape
- What the 26 Critic Reviews Represent
- Comparing Scores Across Platforms
- Finding and Interpreting the Current Score
- The Metacritic Page as a Research Tool
- The Broader Significance of "Your Name" on Metacritic
- Conclusion
- You Might Also Like
The film’s presence on Metacritic reflects its status as one of the most culturally significant anime productions in recent memory, comparable to how the platform treats live-action blockbusters.
To find the precise Metascore for “Your Name,” you’ll need to visit Metacritic’s dedicated page for the film, where both the critic consensus score and user review section are available. This direct approach ensures you’re seeing the most current rating, as scores can shift as new critics submit reviews or the platform updates its methodology.
Table of Contents
- How Metacritic Scores Work for Anime Films
- Understanding “Your Name” in the Anime Critical Landscape
- What the 26 Critic Reviews Represent
- Comparing Scores Across Platforms
- Finding and Interpreting the Current Score
- The Metacritic Page as a Research Tool
- The Broader Significance of “Your Name” on Metacritic
- Conclusion
How Metacritic Scores Work for Anime Films
metacritic compiles reviews from professional critics and converts them into a standardized 0-100 scale to create its Metascore.
For “Your Name,” the 26 critic reviews on file represent a diverse range of publications—from major film outlets to specialty anime critics—each contributing their assessment of the film. Unlike some lesser-known anime that might have only 5-10 reviews aggregated, “Your Name” benefits from the extensive critical coverage typical of wide-release or highly anticipated films.
This larger sample size generally produces a more stable and representative score, though it can also mean that mixed reviews from major outlets have more statistical weight. The user review section on Metacritic operates separately from the critic score, gathering ratings from general audiences.
While professional critics tend to evaluate anime through one lens, user reviews often reflect the passionate fanbase that made “Your Name” a global phenomenon. The distinction between these two scores can be instructive—sometimes a film beloved by fans receives a more measured critical reception, or vice versa.
Understanding “Your Name” in the Anime Critical Landscape
“Your Name” holds a unique position in anime criticism because it transcended typical genre boundaries. When Metacritic evaluates anime films, critics often approach them through the lens of general cinema rather than anime-specific standards—this has been a limitation historically, as some prestigious publications initially lacked dedicated anime critics.
For “Your Name,” however, the film’s mainstream success meant it received attention from major film critics who might not typically cover animation, broadening the perspective of its Metacritic reviews.
One important caveat: Metacritic’s scoring system, while useful, doesn’t capture the nuanced reasons why critics praised or critiqued specific elements of “Your Name.” Some reviewers may have celebrated its emotional storytelling and animation quality, while others might have noted criticisms about pacing or narrative complexity.
The aggregated score is a summary tool, not a complete picture of critical sentiment.
What the 26 Critic Reviews Represent
The 26 professional critics contributing to “Your Name”‘s Metacritic page represent a significant body of opinion. These aren’t random reviews—Metacritic curates its critic list from established publications, giving greater weight to reviews from well-known outlets.
This means that a review from The New York Times or Variety has more influence on the Metascore than a review from a smaller blog, though both are included in the tally.
For context, this volume of reviews is comparable to what mainstream Hollywood releases receive, underscoring “Your Name”‘s crossover appeal. The diversity of these reviews matters. Some critics approached the film as an animation enthusiast, while others evaluated it primarily as a romance drama that happened to be animated.
This variety in critical perspective can produce interesting debates among readers when you read individual reviews on the platform—some critics emphasize the technical animation excellence, others focus on the screenplay’s emotional impact.
Comparing Scores Across Platforms
“Your Name” isn’t limited to Metacritic—it also appears on imdb, Rotten Tomatoes, and MyAnimeList, each with different scoring methodologies and critic bases.
IMDb’s user-generated scores tend to reflect fan enthusiasm more directly, while Rotten Tomatoes uses a binary “fresh or rotten” system that can feel reductive for a nuanced film. Checking multiple platforms gives a fuller picture than relying on any single aggregator.
Interestingly, the gap between critic and audience scores on these platforms often says something about how “Your Name” bridges mainstream and niche audiences.
The tradeoff of using Metacritic specifically is that you get professional perspective but miss the raw enthusiasm of the anime community that dominates IMDb and MyAnimeList. For a film as culturally significant as “Your Name,” consulting all three sources provides better context than any single score.
Finding and Interpreting the Current Score
To access “Your Name”‘s current Metascore, visit Metacritic’s dedicated page for the film, where you’ll find the aggregated critic score prominently displayed at the top. The page also breaks down scores by critic (showing which publications gave high, medium, or low ratings) and includes links to full reviews.
One warning: don’t assume a Metascore tells you whether you personally will like the film.
A 75 or an 85 or a 95—whatever the current score is—reflects professional consensus, not individual taste. The user review section presents another layer of data.
If you’re trying to decide whether to watch “Your Name,” comparing the critic consensus with user ratings can reveal whether the film appeals primarily to critics or to general audiences. Some films are “critic’s darlings” that underwhelm general viewers, while others achieve rare agreement across both camps.
The Metacritic Page as a Research Tool
Beyond the raw score, Metacritic’s page for “Your Name” functions as a research archive. You can read individual critic reviews, sorted by score or publication, which helps you understand specific praise or criticism.
For someone researching anime’s critical reception in mainstream media, this aggregated page is invaluable—it shows how 26 different professionals evaluated the same film, creating a natural comparative analysis.
The page also includes metadata like the film’s director (Makoto Shinkai), release date, and genre tags, making it useful for broader research about animated films’ critical standing in professional outlets.
The Broader Significance of “Your Name” on Metacritic
“Your Name” appearing on Metacritic with 26 reviews reflects a significant moment in how the platform—and mainstream film criticism—treats anime. A decade or two earlier, anime films were rarely reviewed by major critics at all. The presence of “Your Name” on Metacritic, with substantial critical coverage, marks anime’s integration into the broader film criticism ecosystem.
This trend suggests that future anime productions of similar cultural impact will receive comparable critical attention. Looking forward, “Your Name”‘s Metacritic presence serves as a benchmark for evaluating other anime films. Critics and audiences can now compare subsequent releases to this highly-reviewed reference point, potentially raising expectations for critical coverage of anime in mainstream venues.
Conclusion
To directly answer the original question: “Your Name” has a Metacritic page with 26 professional critic reviews aggregated into a Metascore, though the exact numerical rating requires visiting the site directly to see the current score.
The film’s substantial critical coverage reflects its cultural significance and mainstream crossover appeal—it’s treated by Metacritic with the same seriousness as live-action releases, a testament to both the film’s quality and the evolving respect for anime in professional criticism.
If you’re interested in critical consensus around “Your Name,” the Metacritic page provides a useful starting point, but pair it with user reviews and other platforms to get a complete picture of how the film landed with both professionals and general audiences.
You Might Also Like
- What Is the Metacritic Rating for Train to Busan
- What Is the Metacritic Rating for The Witch Part 1 The Subversion
- What Is the Metacritic Rating for The Martian
For more on Metacritic Rating Name, see the full breakdown above – the metacritic rating name details cover what most viewers want to know.
