What Is the Metacritic Rating for The Mummy 2026

Lee Cronin's The Mummy holds a Metacritic rating of 46, placing it squarely in the "mixed reviews" category that indicates critics remain divided on the...

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy holds a Metacritic rating of 46, placing it squarely in the “mixed reviews” category that indicates critics remain divided on the film’s merits.

Released on April 17, 2026, this horror remake has sparked considerable debate among film critics who praise its commitment to gore and emotional stakes while expressing reservations about its execution.

The 46 score reflects a film that doesn’t quite achieve critical consensus—some reviewers found it effective, while others found its lengthy runtime worked against its horror impact. A Metacritic score of 46 typically signals a film that has legitimate artistic ambitions and executes certain elements well, but falls short of being a critical success.

For context, this places The Mummy below the 50-point threshold where Metacritic formally designates a film as receiving “mixed or average reviews.” The rating matters because it shapes viewer expectations and influences which audiences are most likely to appreciate what Cronin has created.

Table of Contents

What Does the Metacritic Score Tell Us About The Mummy 2026?

The 46 score on metacritic comes from aggregating reviews from dozens of critics across major publications and platforms.

This methodology attempts to distill professional critical opinion into a single number, though like all aggregation systems, it masks the reality that individual reviews vary dramatically. Some critics gave The Mummy strong scores while others were considerably harsher, but enough weighted toward the negative to land the film at 46.

This particular score is meaningful because it reveals something specific about how critics perceived the film’s construction.

The consensus, based on individual reviews, suggests that Cronin assembled the pieces of a potentially effective horror film—genuine scares, gore that serves a narrative purpose, performances that convey real stakes—but the pacing and runtime prevented these elements from working in concert.

This is a different kind of critical failure than a film that lacks ambition; it’s one where ambition exceeded execution.

Comparing this to other recent horror remakes: A 46 on Metacritic places The Mummy below successful modern horror films like The Invisible Man (2020, which scored 65) but above widely dismissed remakes that typically score in the 20s or 30s.

This positions The Mummy as a middle ground—a film critics take seriously enough to engage with critically, rather than dismissing outright.

What Does the Metacritic Score Tell Us About The Mummy 2026?

Understanding the Mixed Critical Reception

The critical division becomes clearer when examining what reviewers specifically praised and criticized. Critics consistently mentioned that the film’s gore effects are convincing and serve narrative purposes rather than existing for spectacle alone.

The performances from Jack Reynor and Laia Costa were noted as committed and emotionally present, which gave the film’s darker moments genuine weight. These weren’t throwaway compliments—they were cited as the film’s genuine strengths. However, the limitations emerge in the film’s structure.

Multiple reviews noted that effective scares and moments of genuine horror became diluted across the film’s runtime, creating sections where momentum stalled.

This is a specific, actionable criticism: the film has the pieces for effective horror, but they’re spread across too much footage. A 110-minute cut of the same material might have scored significantly higher, whereas the actual runtime appears to have worked against the film’s effectiveness.

One important limitation to understand: Metacritic’s 46 isn’t a consensus that The Mummy is bad. It’s a statement that critics couldn’t agree it was good.

In markets where critical consensus is important to the audience (cinephile communities, film discussion forums), a 46 functions as a yellow flag rather than a red one.

Some viewers will specifically seek it out because mixed reviews from a critic like Lee Cronin suggest something genuinely different from standard genre offerings.

The Mummy 2026 vs Recent Action FilmsThe Mummy68Indiana Jones 570MI776Tomb Raider 262National Treasure65Source: Metacritic

How The Mummy 2026 Compares on Rotten Tomatoes

The Rotten Tomatoes score of approximately 47% runs nearly parallel to the Metacritic rating, though the scoring systems measure different things. Rotten Tomatoes uses a binary approach—critics either recommend a film or they don’t—while Metacritic captures the degree of their opinion.

In this case, both platforms reached similar conclusions: roughly half of critics had positive things to say, while roughly half were more negative. This alignment between two major review aggregators strengthens the conclusion that the critical reception is genuinely mixed rather than one platform being an outlier.

When multiple review systems converge on a middle-ground score within days of release, it typically indicates the film is correctly assessed. The Mummy isn’t a film that one aggregator unfairly scored; it’s a film where the critical community genuinely split.

The specific example here illustrates a practical point: if you’re considering watching The Mummy, the fact that both Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes landed in the 46-47 range means these scores are reliable indicators of what you’ll likely encounter. This isn’t a situation where one platform over-praised or under-praised the film.

How The Mummy 2026 Compares on Rotten Tomatoes

What Critics Specifically Praised and Criticized

The most consistent praise across reviews centered on the film’s willingness to commit to its premise. Jack Reynor and Laia Costa play characters with genuine emotional stakes, and the narrative grounds their horror in personal consequence rather than generic jeopardy. Critics noted that the gore isn’t exploitative; it emerges organically from the story.

When compared to other contemporary horror films that treat violence as a selling point separate from narrative, The Mummy’s integration of graphic content into character motivation stood out. The most consistent criticism involved pacing and length.

Multiple reviewers noted that by the third act, the scares that had landed effectively in the film’s opening sequences felt repetitive or exhausted. This suggests the screenplay ran out of meaningful directions for its central conflict and resorted to extending sequences that had already made their point.

A practical example: if a particular scare technique works powerfully in the first act, repeating it in the third act without variation doesn’t increase its impact—it diminishes it. The tradeoff here matters for potential viewers.

You’re choosing between a film that respects its audience enough to include graphic imagery with narrative purpose (a plus) but struggles to sustain that investment across its entire runtime (a minus).

Different viewers will weight these factors differently—some will appreciate the commitment to stakes and forgive the pacing issues, while others will find the runtime unbearable.

The Implications of a 46 Score for Different Audiences

A 46 on Metacritic has different meaning depending on what you value as a viewer. For horror enthusiasts specifically interested in the subgenre’s artistic possibilities and willing to engage with flawed ambition, a 46 from a director like Lee Cronin signals something worth investigating.

Horror is a genre where critical consensus is often lower anyway—audiences frequently prefer films critics dismiss. A 46 horror film may actually outperform a 46 drama because horror audiences weight different factors than critics do.

However, there’s a limitation to understand: the 46 score reflects professional critics who were given advance screenings and evaluated the film on standard critical metrics.

General audiences discovering The Mummy without expectation-setting might experience it differently. The audience score on these platforms typically runs higher than the critical score for mixed films, suggesting that viewers who watch it casually often enjoy it more than critics did.

This matters because it suggests the film may be critic-proof—certain viewers will find it entertaining regardless of the 46 score. The warning here is specificity: a 46 score doesn’t tell you whether The Mummy is bad or good in absolute terms.

It tells you that critics couldn’t agree, and where they did agree, they felt the film had real strengths undermined by real structural problems. Reading individual reviews alongside the aggregate score gives you much better predictive power about whether you’ll enjoy it.

The Implications of a 46 Score for Different Audiences

The Cast and Critical Recognition

Jack Reynor and Laia Costa received consistent recognition from critics for their performances, even in reviews that were ultimately negative about the film overall. This is notable because it demonstrates that the film’s problems weren’t rooted in weak acting or lack of commitment from the leads.

Reynor in particular was praised for grounding emotional reality in a premise that could easily have become absurd, while Costa was credited with creating a character that generated genuine concern from viewers.

The fact that a 46-rated film generated praise for its cast suggests these performances could have been better served by a more tightly structured film. This reinforces the critical consensus that The Mummy’s problems are primarily architectural rather than performative.

What The Mummy 2026’s Rating Suggests About Modern Horror

The 46 score arrived in April 2026, a period where horror cinema is experiencing significant fragmentation in critical reception. Films released recently either achieved strong critical consensus in the 65+ range or landed in the mixed-to-negative zone where The Mummy sits.

This suggests horror audiences and critics are increasingly polarized about what constitutes effective contemporary horror, with little middle ground.

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy exists in a landscape where ambition is rewarded even when execution wavers, but where that ambition must clear higher bars than it did in previous decades. The 46 score is a statement that the film has interesting DNA but problematic presentation.

Whether that matters to your viewing depends entirely on what you prioritize.

Conclusion

The Metacritic rating of 46 for Lee Cronin’s The Mummy provides a reliable aggregate assessment of critical opinion: reviewers found genuine merit in the film’s commitment to gore with narrative purpose and strong lead performances, but felt the pacing and runtime diluted the horror’s effectiveness.

This isn’t a failed film so much as an ambitious one that couldn’t quite execute its ambition across its full length. The near-identical Rotten Tomatoes score of 47% confirms that this assessment reflects genuine critical division rather than platform variation.

If you’re considering whether to watch The Mummy, the 46 score suggests you should be prepared for a film with real strengths that are undercut by real structural problems. Horror audiences often find value in films critics rate as mixed, so the 46 shouldn’t automatically dissuade you—but it should inform your expectations.

The film seems designed for viewers willing to engage with ambitious horror that doesn’t quite stick the landing, rather than those seeking either critical consensus or crowd-pleasing entertainment.


You Might Also Like

For more on Metacritic Rating Mummy, see the full breakdown above – the metacritic rating mummy details cover what most viewers want to know.

Whether you searched for metacritic rating mummy reviews, metacritic rating mummy streaming, or metacritic rating mummy cast, this guide consolidates the relevant metacritic rating mummy facts in one place.

Reference sources: