What Is the Metacritic Rating for Doctor Strange

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness carries a Metacritic score of 60 out of 100, based on 65 professional critic reviews Updated for 2026.

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness carries a Metacritic score of 60 out of 100, based on 65 professional critic reviews. This score falls into the “mixed or average” category, indicating that critics were divided on the film’s merits rather than embracing it with enthusiasm.

Unlike the original Doctor Strange from 2016, which has critic reviews available on Metacritic, the sequel’s documented score tells a clear story of a divided critical response to Marvel’s ambitious multiversal narrative.

The gap between professional critics and general audiences is notable with the Multiverse sequel. When you visit the Metacritic page for Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, you’ll find both the critic metascore and a separate user review section, which often reveals significant divergence.

A 60 score from critics doesn’t automatically predict how audiences will respond—some viewers embrace the film’s darker tone and visual experimentation, while critics frequently cited pacing issues and narrative complexity as drawbacks.

Table of Contents

How Does Doctor Strange’s Metacritic Score Compare to Other MCU Films?

The Multiverse of Madness score of 60 places it in the lower-to-middle tier of the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s critical reception.

By comparison, many MCU films score in the 66-80 range, while some outliers like Thor: Ragnarok and Avengers: infinity war achieved higher critical acclaim.

The 60 score suggests that while the film has merit, critics found enough issues to prevent it from reaching the broader approval level that other Marvel entries achieved.

This scoring context matters because it reflects fundamental debates among critics about what Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness attempted versus what it delivered. Director Sam Raimi’s horror-inflected approach divided the critical community.

Some reviewers praised the visual inventiveness and departure from typical MCU formula, while others criticized the screenplay’s handling of character arcs and the balance between spectacle and story coherence.

How Does Doctor Strange's Metacritic Score Compare to Other MCU Films?

Understanding the 60/100 Metascore: What “Mixed or Average” Really Means

A metacritic score of 60 carries specific weight in the platform’s scoring system. The classification breaks down as: 0-20 (universal panning), 21-50 (generally unfavorable), 51-75 (mixed or average), and 76-100 (universal acclaim).

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness lands comfortably within the “mixed” territory, which means professional critics couldn’t agree on whether the film succeeded or failed on its own terms.

What this score doesn’t convey is the nature of the division. Some critics may have given it a 40 because they felt it betrayed Doctor Strange’s character, while others gave it a 75 because they appreciated Raimi’s stylistic choices.

The 60 average masks these variations, which is why reading individual reviews provides more nuance than the single number. This limitation is important to remember when using Metacritic as your sole reference point for critical reception.

Doctor Strange Metacritic Scores ComparisonDoctor Strange (2016)60 Metacritic ScoreDoctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)72 Metacritic ScoreMCU Average51 Metacritic Score“Mixed/Average” Range Start75 Metacritic ScoreSource: Metacritic.com

How Critics Evaluated Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness

The 65 professional reviews contributing to the 60 score came from major outlets, critics, and specialty publications.

Critics generally praised the film’s visual approach and some of its supporting performances, but frequently returned to complaints about pacing, the treatment of the title character, and whether the multiversal concept was adequately explored or became a distraction from character development.

One specific criticism that emerged across multiple reviews centered on how the film balanced its horror elements with MCU expectations. Some critics felt this blend was refreshing; others believed it created an uncomfortable tonal mismatch that undermined both ambitions.

This kind of substantive disagreement—rooted in artistic choices rather than technical execution—typically produces the kind of middling scores that characterize the 55-65 range.

How Critics Evaluated Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness

Using Metacritic Ratings to Guide Your Movie Choices

When you’re deciding whether to watch Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, the Metacritic score of 60 serves as a warning that you should check individual reviews aligned with your own preferences.

If you value bold directorial vision and visual experimentation, critics who gave it higher scores may be more relevant to you than those who weighted traditional storytelling more heavily. The score itself doesn’t tell you this distinction.

Comparing the Multiverse sequel’s 60 to other films in similar categories is more useful than treating it as an isolated number. A 60 on Metacritic represents a different critical verdict than a 70 or a 50.

It suggests the film is worth watching if you’re interested in the character or franchise, but it’s not a must-see based on critical consensus alone. user reviews on the same Metacritic page often provide an additional perspective, sometimes significantly diverging from the critic score.

The Difference Between Critic and Audience Scores

Metacritic maintains separate scores for professional critics and general audiences for Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.

These scores frequently diverge, and the Multiverse sequel is one example where the gap reveals something important: audiences sometimes rate superhero films more favorably when they engage with action and spectacle, while critics evaluate broader narrative coherence and character development. This isn’t a flaw in either group—it reflects different evaluation frameworks.

A critical limitation of relying solely on Metacritic is that it can’t tell you why the discrepancy exists. The user score might be higher because audiences enjoy the film more, or it might be inflated by fans invested in the Marvel universe regardless of critical opinion.

Understanding that Metacritic represents aggregated judgments rather than consensus is essential to interpreting any score, whether it’s 60 or 85.

The Difference Between Critic and Audience Scores

The Original Doctor Strange’s Critical Reception

The 2016 Doctor Strange has critic reviews available on Metacritic, though the specific composite score from that film provides a useful comparison point. The original received a generally favorable critical response that exceeded the Multiverse sequel’s 60.

This comparison illustrates how critical reception shifted between the two films—the first film was more traditionally well-received, while the sequel’s ambition created a more polarized critical response.

This difference matters for understanding the Doctor Strange franchise’s critical trajectory. The original established the character and world to general approval; the sequel attempted to expand both with mixed results.

Neither film achieved the highest tier of MCU critical acclaim, but the first film’s better score suggests it found a more coherent balance between spectacle and character work.

What the Metacritic Ratings Mean for Future Doctor Strange Films

The 60 score for Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness doesn’t necessarily dictate the MCU’s approach to future Doctor Strange stories. Studios and filmmakers review Metacritic scores alongside box office performance and audience satisfaction metrics.

A film can score 60 on Metacritic and still be commercially successful, influencing future projects based on what worked financially rather than what critics preferred.

Looking forward, any new Doctor Strange appearance will be evaluated against these established benchmarks. Future films will either move closer to the first film’s critical reception or continue the mixed response if filmmakers pursue similarly experimental approaches.

Metacritic scores inform industry decisions, but they’re not the only factor—audience enthusiasm, franchise momentum, and creative ambition all weigh into what comes next.

Conclusion

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness carries a Metacritic score of 60 out of 100 based on 65 professional reviews, placing it in the “mixed or average” category of critical reception. This score reflects a divided critical opinion on Sam Raimi’s ambitious but potentially overextended approach to the multiversal storyline and character arcs.

While some critics appreciated the bold visual direction, others felt the film sacrificed narrative clarity and character development in pursuit of spectacle. If you’re considering watching the film, the 60 score is most useful when combined with reading individual reviews that align with your viewing preferences.

Checking both critic and user reviews on Metacritic provides a more complete picture than the single number alone, revealing whether critics’ concerns matter to you personally or whether their praise outweighs their reservations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a 60 score on Metacritic actually mean?

A 60 falls in the “mixed or average” category, indicating critics were divided—roughly half found the film successful while others had significant reservations.

Is Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness worth watching despite the 60 score?

That depends on your preferences. If you enjoy bold directorial choices and visual experimentation, some critics’ positive reviews may outweigh the middling score. If you prioritize coherent storytelling, the mixed reception is a warning sign.

How does the Multiverse of Madness score compare to the original Doctor Strange?

The 2022 sequel’s 60 score is lower than the 2016 original’s critical reception, suggesting the first film found better balance between spectacle and character work.

Why do critic scores sometimes differ dramatically from audience scores on Metacritic?

Critics evaluate narrative structure, directorial choices, and thematic coherence; audiences may weight spectacle, character loyalty, and franchise engagement differently. Different evaluation frameworks can produce different results.

Where can I find detailed Doctor Strange reviews on Metacritic?

Visit the film’s Metacritic page directly, where you’ll find the critic metascore, user reviews, and individual critic scores that let you read perspectives aligned with your viewing preferences.

Does a 60 Metacritic score mean the movie is bad?

No. A 60 means critics were mixed, not that the film is objectively poor. Many successful, enjoyable films score in the 50-70 range when critical opinion is divided.


You Might Also Like

For more on Metacritic Rating Doctor, see the full breakdown above – the metacritic rating doctor details cover what most viewers want to know.

Whether you searched for metacritic rating doctor reviews, metacritic rating doctor streaming, or metacritic rating doctor cast, this guide consolidates the relevant metacritic rating doctor facts in one place.

Reference sources: