While Rotten Tomatoes ratings fluctuate as critics add their scores, “It Follows” stands among the highest-rated horror films on the platform with a critics score in the mid-90s, a achievement that reflects both critical consensus and the film’s innovative take on supernatural terror. The 2014 indie film directed by David Robert Mitchell earned widespread acclaim for its slow-burn dread, minimal dialogue, and relentless concept: a supernatural curse that stalks a teenage girl and passes to anyone she sleeps with.
This combination of high ratings, limited budget, and mainstream recognition demonstrates how Rotten Tomatoes has shifted conversations about what constitutes prestige horror. Beyond “It Follows,” older films like “Psycho” (1960) and “The Haunting” (1963) compete for the top spots, each holding ratings above 95 percent. The differences between them matter less than understanding why these films achieved and sustained such scores—they represent the kind of horror that critics and audiences both respect, rather than films that divide the crowd.
Table of Contents
- Which Horror Films Rate Highest on Rotten Tomatoes?
- How Does Critical Rating Differ from Audience Ratings?
- The Role of Time and Reevaluation in Horror Ratings
- What Makes a Horror Film Rate So Highly?
- The Limitation of Rotten Tomatoes for Horror
- How Horror Film Quality Has Changed
- The Current Landscape of Critically Respected Horror
Which Horror Films Rate Highest on Rotten Tomatoes?
The rotten tomatoes Tomatometer uses a binary system: critics either recommend or don’t recommend a film, making ratings above 90 percent genuinely rare and significant. “Psycho,” despite its age and cultural ubiquity, maintains a 96 percent critics score, an achievement tied to Alfred Hitchcock’s technical mastery and the film’s influence on the entire genre. “The Haunting,” a 1963 psychological horror film, hovers around 95 percent and represents a different era of horror entirely—one focused on suggestion rather than gore or jump scares.
These three films (including “It Follows”) represent the current conversation about the highest-rated horror on the platform, though exact rankings shift as new votes accumulate. What’s worth noting is that both older films predate the modern Rotten Tomatoes critical consensus, meaning their scores reflect decades of critic reevaluation rather than immediate contemporary reception. “Psycho” was originally controversial for its violence; “The Haunting” was considered serious cinema, not genre entertainment. Their high scores now reflect critical reassessment and the recognition that horror films can achieve artistic goals beyond startling audiences.
How Does Critical Rating Differ from Audience Ratings?
On rotten Tomatoes, the Tomatometer (critics) and Audience Score function as separate metrics, and high-rated horror films often show dramatic splits between the two. “It Follows” earned critical acclaim while its Audience Score sits considerably lower, a gap that reflects critics’ appreciation for unconventional storytelling versus viewers seeking cathartic or visceral experiences. “The Shining,” another frequently mentioned contender, shows similar splits—critics praise Stanley Kubrick’s technical control and psychological depth, while audiences remain split on whether the film works as horror or as something else entirely.
This split matters because it reveals what “highest-rated” actually means: critical respect, not universal crowd-pleasing. A film with a 94 percent critics score and 72 percent audience score has achieved something different from a film with 80 percent on both metrics. For horror specifically, this gap is common and instructive—the genre’s greatest works often challenge audiences rather than satisfy them, which is precisely what critics reward.
The Role of Time and Reevaluation in Horror Ratings
Horror films from earlier eras benefit from critical reevaluation that contemporary films have not yet received. “Nosferatu,” the 1922 vampire film, holds a very high rating partly because a century of film history has clarified its importance and influence. Films released in 2020 or 2021, even if critically acclaimed, haven’t yet accumulated the hundreds or thousands of critic votes that older films have; their ratings may shift significantly over five or ten years.
This time factor is invisible to viewers who assume current ratings reflect something fixed and permanent. “Hereditary,” Ari Aster’s 2018 film, maintains a strong critics rating (around 89 percent) and shows what contemporary horror achieves, but it will likely undergo rating shifts as more critics vote and as the film’s initial shock value settles. The films currently topping the Rotten Tomatoes horror rankings often benefited from decades of critical consensus-building, which newer horror films cannot yet claim.
What Makes a Horror Film Rate So Highly?
High-rated horror films on Rotten Tomatoes typically share a commitment to atmosphere, craft, and some form of thematic depth beyond scares. “The Haunting” achieved its rating by treating psychological dread as its primary tool; the film focuses on the interior lives of its characters and the ambiguity of whether the haunting is real or psychological. “Psycho” earned its score through technical innovation (the shower sequence), narrative structure, and the way it challenged film-making conventions of its era.
“It Follows” succeeded by creating an original concept and executing it with visual rigor and constraint—the curse is invisible, which forces the filmmakers and audience into a different relationship with fear. Compare these to contemporary horror films that achieve lower scores: many rely on jump scares, graphic violence, or familiar concepts executed predictably. Critics reward horror that treats the genre as a serious tool for exploring real fears—social anxiety (in “It Follows”), domestic violence and inherited trauma (in “Hereditary”), or institutional power (in “The Haunting’s” reading of its all-female dynamic). A film that simply wants to gross out viewers will rarely break 80 percent critical approval.
The Limitation of Rotten Tomatoes for Horror
Rotten Tomatoes’ binary system (recommend or don’t) creates problems specific to horror. A critic might find a film technically flawed but emotionally effective, or brilliantly made but emotionally hollow—the system forces a yes-or-no choice that doesn’t capture these nuances. A film with a 75 percent score might contain 25 percent of critics who found it well-crafted but not scary, mixed with 25 percent who found it terrifying but poorly executed.
The score obscures these disagreements. Horror, more than any genre, demands this kind of detail: knowing *why* critics recommend or reject a film matters enormously. Additionally, Rotten Tomatoes scores skew toward critics working for major publications, toward English-language reviews, and toward critics with established voting histories. International horror films, regional films, and lesser-known works are systematically underrepresented, meaning the “highest-rated horror on Rotten Tomatoes” tells a story about mainstream critical access as much as film quality.
How Horror Film Quality Has Changed
The highest-rated horror films span nearly a century, and comparing “Psycho” (1960) to “It Follows” (2014) reveals real shifts in how horror functions. “Psycho” treats the monster as human and psychological; the horror emerges from realism violated.
“It Follows” treats the monster as abstract and invisible, creating a different kind of dread. Neither approach is superior, but critics rating both highly suggests respect for horror that takes formal or conceptual risks rather than following established patterns. “The Haunting” (1963) sits chronologically and tonally between them, using ambiguity about the supernatural itself as its central tool.
The Current Landscape of Critically Respected Horror
Beyond the highest-rated films, the tier just below (80-90 percent) includes “The Ring” (2002), “Poltergeist” (1982), “The Exorcist” (1973), and “Hereditary” (2018)—a mix of ages that shows no single decade dominates critical respect in horror. What unites them is that each introduced or perfected something the genre had not seen before: “The Ring” brought internet-age anxiety into horror; “The Exorcist” committed major studio resources to visceral psychological horror; “Hereditary” applied prestige-drama acting and cinematography to family trauma. These films’ ratings reflect critics’ consistent reward for innovation and seriousness of intent within the horror genre.
- —
