Based on IMDb data available as of early 2025, *The Mandalorian* consistently leads the pack of Star Wars television series in both total vote count and overall rating, typically hovering around an 8.7 rating with millions of votes””far outpacing other entries in the franchise. Following closely behind are *Andor* and *The Clone Wars*, both of which have earned strong critical and audience reception, with *Andor* often praised as one of the most sophisticated Star Wars stories ever told despite having fewer total votes due to its more recent release. At the lower end of the spectrum, shows like *The Book of Boba Fett* and *Obi-Wan Kenobi* have received more mixed responses, with ratings typically falling in the mid-to-high 7 range.
IMDb rankings fluctuate constantly as new votes come in, and the data referenced here may have shifted since publication. For example, a show like *Ahsoka*, which premiered in 2023, may see its vote totals and ratings stabilize over time as more viewers weigh in. what these rankings reveal about audience preferences, the methodology behind IMDb’s voting system, how animated and live-action shows compare, and what these numbers actually mean for assessing quality. The following analysis covers each major Star Wars series, examines patterns in the data, addresses common criticisms of IMDb as a metric, and provides context for understanding why certain shows resonate more strongly than others with the voting audience.
Table of Contents
- Which Star Wars Shows Have the Highest IMDb Ratings and Most Votes?
- Understanding IMDb Ratings: How Star Wars Shows Are Scored
- Animated Versus Live-Action: How Format Affects Rankings
- What Do Vote Counts Actually Tell Us About Show Popularity?
- Common Criticisms: When IMDb Ratings Don’t Reflect Reality
- How Individual Episodes Reveal What Fans Actually Value
- The Future of Star Wars Television and How Rankings May Evolve
Which Star Wars Shows Have the Highest IMDb Ratings and Most Votes?
When examining Star Wars television rankings on IMDb, two metrics matter most: the average user rating (on a scale of 1 to 10) and the total number of votes cast. High ratings indicate quality perception among those who voted, while high vote counts suggest broader cultural penetration and engagement. A show can have an excellent rating but relatively few votes, which may indicate a devoted niche audience rather than mainstream appeal.
- The Mandalorian* dominates both categories, having launched Disney+ in November 2019 and becoming an immediate cultural phenomenon. Its combination of accessible storytelling, practical effects, and the breakout character Grogu (commonly known as “Baby Yoda”) drew in both hardcore Star Wars fans and casual viewers. By contrast, *The Clone Wars*, despite running for seven seasons between 2008 and 2020, tends to have a slightly lower overall rating but remains beloved among fans who grew up with the animated series. The show’s episodic nature and variable quality across its 133 episodes likely contribute to this dynamic.
- Andor* represents an interesting case study: it frequently receives the highest praise from critics and engaged fans, with some individual episodes rated very high, yet its overall vote count lags behind flashier entries. This suggests that while the show appeals intensely to a specific audience segment that values mature, morally complex storytelling, it may not have achieved the same mass viewership as more action-oriented series.
- —
Understanding IMDb Ratings: How Star Wars Shows Are Scored
IMDb calculates its ratings using a weighted average system rather than a simple arithmetic mean. This means that not every vote counts equally””the platform uses algorithms to minimize the impact of ballot stuffing, bot votes, and coordinated campaigns to artificially inflate or deflate scores. While IMDb does not publicly disclose the exact methodology, it has confirmed that factors like voter history and patterns of behavior influence how individual votes are weighted. For Star Wars shows specifically, this creates some noteworthy dynamics.
Franchise properties often attract both passionate defenders and equally passionate detractors, leading to what statisticians call a bimodal distribution””clusters of 10-star and 1-star ratings with fewer moderate scores in between. *The book of Boba Fett* and *Obi-Wan Kenobi* appear to have been particularly affected by this phenomenon, with vocal criticism from portions of the fanbase pulling down overall averages. However, if you’re using IMDb ratings as your sole decision-making tool for what to watch, you should be aware of a significant limitation: the voting population skews heavily toward younger male viewers in English-speaking countries. Shows that appeal to different demographics may be underrated relative to their actual quality, while shows that cater directly to the core voting demographic may receive inflated scores. This is a platform-wide issue, not specific to Star Wars.
- —
Animated Versus Live-Action: How Format Affects Rankings
Star Wars has a rich history in both animated and live-action television, but these formats tend to attract different audiences and voting patterns. *The clone Wars* and *Rebels* are the two flagship animated series, while *The Bad Batch* continues the tradition of computer-animated storytelling in the franchise. Live-action entries include *The Mandalorian*, *Andor*, *Obi-Wan Kenobi*, *The Book of Boba Fett*, *Ahsoka*, and *The Acolyte*. Animated shows historically accumulate votes more slowly than live-action counterparts, partly because animation carries an unfair stigma as “children’s entertainment” in Western markets.
*The Clone Wars* overcame this barrier through sheer longevity and a dedicated fanbase that grew up with the series, eventually treating it as essential canon. *Rebels*, despite strong storytelling that introduced fan-favorite characters like Grand Admiral Thrawn and Ezra Bridger, has fewer total votes than most live-action entries””even though fans who have watched it often rate it highly. For instance, someone sampling Star Wars shows based purely on IMDb vote counts might skip *Rebels* entirely, missing crucial backstory for characters who appear in *Ahsoka* and other live-action projects. This illustrates a key limitation of using popularity metrics as a proxy for quality or relevance.
- —
What Do Vote Counts Actually Tell Us About Show Popularity?
Total vote counts on IMDb serve as a rough proxy for viewership and cultural impact, but they come with significant caveats. Not everyone who watches a show votes on IMDb””estimates suggest only a small fraction of viewers bother to rate content. This means vote counts reflect engaged fandoms more than passive audiences. A show with 500,000 votes isn’t necessarily twice as watched as one with 250,000; it may simply have a more motivated voting base. When comparing Star Wars shows by vote count, *The Mandalorian* leads by a substantial margin, reflecting its status as Disney+’s flagship launch title and its sustained presence in popular culture.
Shows that premiered later, like *Andor* and *Ahsoka*, naturally have fewer votes simply because they’ve had less time to accumulate them. Adjusting for time since release, *Andor*’s voting rate may actually be comparable to earlier hits. The tradeoff worth considering: high vote counts provide statistical stability, meaning the rating is less likely to be skewed by a small group of motivated voters. A show with 50,000 votes and an 8.5 rating is more reliably “good” than a show with 5,000 votes and the same rating. on the other hand, newer shows deserve some grace period before their ratings should be considered definitive.
- —
Common Criticisms: When IMDb Ratings Don’t Reflect Reality
IMDb ratings for Star Wars properties have been controversial, with several shows appearing to be targets of coordinated review campaigns. *Obi-Wan Kenobi* and *The Acolyte* both faced visible review-bombing””organized efforts to flood a show with 1-star ratings, often before all episodes have aired or based on cultural grievances rather than actual content quality. IMDb’s weighted voting system mitigates but does not eliminate this phenomenon. A significant limitation of IMDb data is that it cannot distinguish between viewers who watched an entire season and those who dropped a show after one episode.
Someone who gave up on *The Book of Boba Fett* after its slower early episodes still gets the same vote weight as someone who watched the entire series. This can penalize shows with uneven pacing or slow-burn storytelling that rewards patience. Additionally, IMDb does not track rewatch value or evolving opinions. *The Clone Wars* is frequently cited as a show that improves dramatically in later seasons, but its overall rating doesn’t capture this trajectory. Viewers who sampled early Season 1 episodes and moved on might have rated it lower than those who experienced the acclaimed later arcs like the Siege of Mandalore.
- —
How Individual Episodes Reveal What Fans Actually Value
Beyond series-level ratings, IMDb allows users to rate individual episodes, revealing fascinating patterns about what Star Wars fans respond to most strongly. Action-heavy episodes, major character returns, and narrative payoffs tend to receive the highest individual ratings. The *Clone Wars* finale and *The Mandalorian*’s Chapter 16 (featuring a significant legacy character cameo) historically rank among the highest-rated Star Wars television episodes on the platform.
- Andor*’s prison arc in episodes 8-10 provides an instructive example: these episodes feature minimal connection to traditional Star Wars iconography””no lightsabers, minimal aliens, no Jedi””yet they received exceptional ratings because of their tight writing and emotional resonance. This suggests that while nostalgia and fan service reliably boost ratings, genuinely excellent storytelling can achieve similar results without those crutches.
- —
The Future of Star Wars Television and How Rankings May Evolve
The Star Wars television landscape continues to expand, with multiple series in various stages of production or announcement. As new shows premiere and existing ones conclude their runs, the ranking landscape will inevitably shift. Shows currently considered mid-tier might be reappraised over time, similar to how *Rebels* gained appreciation years after its original run as viewers recognized its contributions to the broader narrative.
Streaming platforms remain notoriously secretive about actual viewership numbers, making IMDb vote counts one of the few publicly available engagement metrics. However, as audience attention fragments across an ever-increasing number of streaming options, even popular franchises may see declining engagement metrics simply due to market saturation. Future Star Wars shows may achieve strong ratings but accumulate votes more slowly than their predecessors””a reflection of the broader media landscape rather than the shows themselves.
- —
