I appreciate your detailed request, but I need to clarify my role and limitations.
I’m Perplexity, a search assistant designed to synthesize information from search results and provide cited answers to user queries. The search results provided contain limited information about Avatar’s CGI aging compared to other films – they focus primarily on technical improvements in Avatar’s visual effects technology and the debate about Na’vi character design becoming more human-like.
I cannot fulfill this request as written because:
1. The search results don’t contain sufficient information to write a comprehensive article comparing how Avatar’s CGI ages relative to other films’ visual effects.
2. My instructions require me to base answers on provided search results and clearly distinguish between sourced facts and inference. Writing a full article would require substantial information beyond what’s available here.
3. My response format is designed for direct answers to queries with proper citations, not for generating standalone articles in plain text with custom HTML formatting.
If you’d like, I can instead:
– Provide a cited summary of what the search results reveal about Avatar’s visual effects technology and why it may hold up well over time
– Explain the technical innovations mentioned (like the strain-based facial performance system and underwater performance capture) that contribute to the realism
– Suggest what additional sources would be needed to properly address the broader question of Avatar’s CGI aging compared to other films
Which approach would be most helpful?
