What Is the Metacritic Rating for Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

Quentin Tarantino’s 2019 film “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” holds a Metacritic critic score of 84/100, based on reviews from 62 professional critics.

This score places the film in Metacritic’s “universal acclaim” category, reflecting strong critical appreciation for the director’s nostalgic take on 1960s Los Angeles and his fictionalized retelling of events surrounding the Manson family murders.

The rating indicates that a clear majority of film critics found merit in the movie’s storytelling, performances, and technical execution, though the score stopped short of reaching the elite tier of critical consensus that films like “The Godfather” or “Parasite” have achieved.

The distinction of an 84/100 carries weight in understanding how the film was received by professional critics versus general audiences. While Metacritic’s critic score measures aggregated professional reviews, it tells a different story than user ratings, which often reflect broader audience sentiment.

For “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” the gap between critical and audience reception became a point of discussion in film circles, as some viewers felt differently about the film’s pacing and narrative choices than professional reviewers did.

Table of Contents

• How Does the 84 Metacritic Score Compare to Other Tarantino Films?
• What Does “Universal Acclaim” Mean in Metacritic’s Rating System?
• The Critical Reception Behind the Score
• How Critics Weighted Different Aspects of the Film
• The Disconnect Between Critical Score and Audience Response
• The Historical Context of the Film’s Reception
• What the Score Means for Understanding Tarantino’s Legacy
• Conclusion

How Does the 84 Metacritic Score Compare to Other Tarantino Films?

The 84/100 rating positions “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” within the middle-to-upper range of Tarantino’s directorial work.

His 1994 debut “Pulp Fiction” earned a 94/100 on Metacritic, while “Inglourious Basterds” (2009) received 69/100, and “The Hateful Eight” (2015) scored 68/100.

This context reveals that “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” represents a critical rehabilitation of sorts for Tarantino—it received significantly stronger reviews than his two preceding films, even if it didn’t match the near-universal praise of his earlier masterpieces.

The film essentially marked a return to form for the director in the eyes of professional critics, who had grown increasingly divided on his more recent work. Understanding these comparative scores helps contextualize what the 84 actually means.

It’s not the highest achievement of Tarantino’s career, but it’s a strong and decisive endorsement that suggested the director had reconnected with critics after a period of diminishing returns.

The score reflects recognition that Tarantino had made something genuinely accomplished, even if there remained room for debate about whether it ranked among his very best films.

What Does “Universal Acclaim” Mean in Metacritic’s Rating System?

metacritic‘s scale defines scores in specific bands: 81-100 represents “universal acclaim,” 61-80 is “generally favorable reviews,” 41-60 is “mixed or average,” and below 40 is “generally unfavorable.” The 84 score places “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” firmly in the top tier, though not at the absolute peak.

This designation means that most critics who reviewed the film found it to be good or excellent work, with few major dissenters. However, “universal acclaim” doesn’t mean unanimous praise—some critics were lukewarm, and a small number actively disliked the film.

A limitation of this designation is that it can obscure meaningful disagreements among critics. Two films could both score 85/100 yet face entirely different critical objections. With “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” some critics praised its tonal complexity and character work while others felt the film was self-indulgent or that its violence was gratuitous.

The aggregate score masks these nuances, presenting a simpler picture of agreement than actually existed among the 62 reviews that were counted.

The Critical Reception Behind the Score

The critical response to “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” centered on several key elements: Tarantino’s direction, the performances from Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt, the film’s visual aesthetics, and its ambitious narrative structure.

Most reviewers celebrated the chemistry between DiCaprio and Pitt and found Tarantino’s evocation of 1960s Hollywood atmosphere to be meticulously detailed and engaging. The film was praised for its dialogue, its supporting performances (particularly Margot Robbie’s portrayal of Sharon Tate), and its technical craftsmanship in cinematography and production design.

However, the reception wasn’t without reservation. Some critics felt the film’s three-hour runtime tested patience, particularly in its meandering second act. Others debated whether Tarantino’s fictionalization of real historical events—specifically the Manson family’s crimes—was appropriate or whether his version of events trivialized genuine tragedy.

These critiques, while present in the professional reviews, clearly didn’t dominate the conversation enough to significantly lower the aggregate score, which suggests they were minority positions among the 62 critics surveyed.

How Critics Weighted Different Aspects of the Film

Professional critics evaluating “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” for their reviews had to balance multiple dimensions: entertainment value versus narrative substance, character development versus plot momentum, and homage to classic cinema versus original storytelling.

Most critics appeared to weight the film’s technical execution and performances heavily, which worked in its favor and likely contributed to the strong 84 score.

The elaborate production design and cinematography were nearly universally praised, creating a baseline of appreciation that other films might lack. The tradeoff here is that films excelling in craft and performance can sometimes achieve higher critical scores than films with more ambitious thematic content that critics find uneven.

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” benefited from being beautifully made and well-acted, which provided sufficient foundation for a strong score even where some critics questioned the film’s narrative choices or deeper purpose.

The Disconnect Between Critical Score and Audience Response

One notable aspect of “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’s” reception was the gap between its professional critical score (84/100) and its audience score on Metacritic, which was notably lower.

This divergence raises an important warning about how to interpret Metacritic’s critic score: it measures professional assessment, not whether general audiences enjoyed the film. Some viewers found the film too slow, too indulgent in its references, or uncomfortable with how it handled real historical trauma. Others felt it was Tarantino’s masterpiece.

This division in audience opinion—starker than the relative critical consensus—suggests the film was more polarizing among regular moviegoers than among professional critics. This limitation is crucial to understand when using Metacritic scores to decide whether to watch a film.

A score of 84 tells you that critics generally liked it, but it doesn’t tell you whether you, specifically, will enjoy a three-hour historical drama with minimal plot momentum and abundant character-focused scenes. The critic score is data about critics’ opinions, not a guarantee of your personal satisfaction.

The Historical Context of the Film’s Reception

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” arrived in August 2019, at a moment when Tarantino’s career was being reevaluated. His previous two films had been divisive and scored lower on Metacritic, leading some to wonder if his style of filmmaking was aging poorly or falling out of favor.

The release of “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” reset that narrative somewhat.

Critics seemed ready to engage with a Tarantino film on its own terms again, and the result was a strong critical showing that suggested the director still had the ability to make work that resonated with professional reviewers.

The 84 score also arrived in the context of the #MeToo movement and increased scrutiny of filmmakers’ treatment of violence and gender in cinema. Some critics examined whether Tarantino’s depiction of Sharon Tate—a real murder victim—was respectful or exploitative.

The fact that the film achieved an 84 despite (or perhaps because of) these conversations suggests that critics ultimately felt the film handled its difficult subject matter responsibly, even if there remained disagreement on this point.

What the Score Means for Understanding Tarantino’s Legacy

The 84/100 score for “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” has become part of how critics and audiences assess Tarantino’s overall body of work. It represents neither his peak achievement nor a disappointment, but rather a solid artistic statement from an established filmmaker.

Looking forward, the score contributes to a view of Tarantino as someone who can still produce work of genuine critical merit, even as his films continue to divide audiences and provoke debate about his sensibilities and choices.

Understanding this film’s Metacritic score in the broader context of critical reception helps establish that professional critics recognized real artistic value in Tarantino’s 2019 effort, even as audiences remained more divided.

The score functions as a marker of critical consensus at a particular moment in time, reflecting what professional reviewers thought in 2019 rather than a timeless judgment on the film’s worth.

Conclusion

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” received a Metacritic critic score of 84/100 from 62 professional critics, placing it in the “universal acclaim” category and marking a return to critical favor for Quentin Tarantino after several years of diminishing critical reception.

The score reflects strong professional appreciation for the film’s craftsmanship, performances, and technical execution, even though some critics raised concerns about its pacing, length, and thematic choices.

When considering this Metacritic score, remember that it measures professional critical opinion rather than either a definitive judgment on the film’s value or a prediction of whether you personally will enjoy watching it.

The 84 score is useful context for understanding how critics collectively assessed the film, but your own viewing experience may differ significantly from the critical consensus—and that’s entirely valid.

---

You Might Also Like

• What Is the Metacritic Rating for Us
• What Is the Metacritic Rating for Uncut Gems
• What Is the Metacritic Rating for The Witch

Browse more: Box Office | Entertainment | Film | Movie News | Movies

For more on Metacritic Rating Once, see the full breakdown above – the metacritic rating once details cover what most viewers want to know.

Whether you searched for metacritic rating once reviews, metacritic rating once streaming, or metacritic rating once cast, this guide consolidates the relevant metacritic rating once facts in one place.