Avatar 3 Box Office by Theater Type

Avatar: Fire and Ash (Avatar 3) opened to a strong but smaller theatrical start than its immediate predecessor, with Thursday previews of about $12 million and opening-weekend projections in the roughly $84–105 million range depending on the tracker and territory cited.[1][3][2]

Context and breakdown by theater type

– Thursday previews and early screenings: Trade reporting and early estimates put Thursday previews at roughly $12 million in North America, a headline figure used by multiple outlets to gauge initial interest[1][3].

– Domestic (North America) three-day opening: Forecasts varied by analyst. Some trackers predicted a domestic three-day opening near $90–105 million, while other industry estimates and early box office tallies clustered the likely three-day range closer to $84–88 million in the first weekend for the roughly 3,800-theater domestic footprint[2][3][6].

– Worldwide and extended openings: Early projections expected a global start in the $340–380 million range for the opening window (including the extended 5-day frame and early international rollouts), with a large share coming from overseas markets[2].

– IMAX and premium large-format (PLF) screens: Historically, Avatar films perform disproportionately well in premium formats (for example, the original Avatar earned a very large IMAX share of its total), and both commentators and analysts expected a meaningful premium-format uplift for Avatar 3; specific early reporting emphasized strong premium-ticket demand but did not publish a single audited dollar split by screen type in the initial estimates available[5]. Observers pointed to past Avatar runs as a reason to expect higher per-screen averages in IMAX and other PLFs compared with standard auditoriums[5].

– Standard 2D/3D multiplex screens: The majority of screens for the release were standard multiplex auditoriums (2D and 3D), with forecasts attributing most of the raw seat count and ticket volume to these venues while premium formats provided outsized per-screen revenue[2][3].

Audience and theater-level indicators

– Theater count and per-theater performance: Reports mentioned about 3,800 domestic theaters for the opening, and analysts used that footprint to estimate per-theater averages and likely three-day totals[3][6].

– Audience composition and repeat business: Post-screening polling indicated strong franchise loyalty among attendees, with high intent to recommend and a notable share of viewers who were fans of the earlier films—factors that typically support sustained legs beyond opening weekend and suggest better repeat business in premium formats where the experience is perceived as superior[3].

What these patterns mean for box office by theater type

– Premium formats (IMAX/PLF): Expect higher per-ticket revenue and a larger contribution to grosses relative to screen share, driven by fan demand for the immersive presentation and elevated ticket prices[5]. This amplifies the film’s box office without requiring a proportional increase in screen count.

– Standard multiplex screens: These provide the volume of viewers and account for most admissions; even with lower per-ticket revenue than PLFs, they form the backbone of the domestic and international grosses[2].

– International multiplexes: A substantial portion of the early global projection was expected from overseas openings, meaning the film’s international distribution and the mix of local multiplex vs premium-screen availability will significantly affect where grosses concentrate[2].

Limitations and why numbers varied

– Projections vs actuals: Early reporting mixed preview tallies, analyst projections, and spot estimates before full audited weekend box office returns were released; different models and different counting windows (3-day vs 5-day) produced the ranges reported[1][2][3][6].

– Lack of detailed audited split by screen type in early reporting: Initial coverage emphasized totals and projections and historic expectations about premium-format performance, but did not provide a complete audited breakdown (IMAX vs PLF vs standard) in the immediate early reports available[5].

Sources
https://www.koimoi.com/box-office/avatar-fire-and-ash-north-america-box-office-lower-than-its-predecessor-still-emerges-as-2025s-5th-biggest-thursday-previews/
https://www.koimoi.com/box-office/avatar-fire-and-ash-worldwide-box-office-projection-strong-start-incoming-despite-a-more-than-12-drop-from-the-way-of-water/
https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/movies/2025/12/20/6946b3d346163faa388b45cb.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkpk_6kQ8g8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkAto_tSjyY
https://screenrant.com/avatar-fire-and-ash-box-office-explained/