Martin Scorsese’s “The Irishman” (2019) stands as a monumental reflection on aging and regret, a three-and-a-half-hour meditation on violence, loyalty, and the devastating toll of a life spent in service to organized crime. This sprawling epic, based on Charles Brandt’s book “I Heard You Paint Houses,” reunites the legendary director with his frequent collaborators Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci while adding Al Pacino to the mix for the first time in a Scorsese film. The result is not merely another gangster movie but a contemplative elegy that subverts many of the genre’s established conventions. What makes this film particularly significant is its willingness to grapple with mortality in ways that earlier mob films rarely attempted.
Where “Goodfellas” crackled with kinetic energy and “Casino” dazzled with excess, “The Irishman” moves with deliberate patience, allowing viewers to watch its characters age across decades until the consequences of their choices become inescapable. The film arrived at a pivotal moment in American cinema, distributed primarily through Netflix after major studios balked at its reported $159 million budget, much of which went toward the groundbreaking de-aging technology used to portray the characters across five decades. By the end of this analysis, readers will understand why “The Irishman” represents a culmination of Scorsese’s career-long examination of American violence, how its technical achievements serve its thematic ambitions, and why its meditation on regret resonates so powerfully with audiences. The film forces viewers to confront uncomfortable questions about complicity, silence, and the price of loyalty to corrupt institutions, making it essential viewing for anyone interested in the evolution of the gangster genre and the art of filmmaking itself.
Table of Contents
- What Makes The Irishman a Unique Reflection on Aging in the Gangster Genre?
- The Irishman’s Exploration of Loyalty, Betrayal, and Moral Compromise
- How Scorsese Uses Time and Mortality to Subvert Genre Expectations
- Understanding The Irishman’s Historical and Political Context
- Technical Achievements and Controversies in The Irishman’s Production
- The Irishman’s Place in Martin Scorsese’s Filmography and Legacy
- How to Prepare
- How to Apply This
- Expert Tips
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Makes The Irishman a Unique Reflection on Aging in the Gangster Genre?
The gangster film genre has traditionally focused on the rise and fall of ambitious criminals, rarely lingering on what happens after the fall. “The Irishman” breaks from this pattern by framing its entire narrative through the lens of an elderly Frank Sheeran (De Niro), confined to a nursing home and looking back on his life with a mixture of pride and profound regret. This structural choice transforms the film from a crime saga into something closer to a confessional, with Frank serving as an unreliable narrator whose very reliability becomes part of the film’s inquiry into truth, memory, and self-justification.
The de-aging technology, while occasionally distracting, serves the film’s themes in crucial ways. Watching De Niro, Pesci, and Pacino digitally rendered as younger men creates an uncanny effect that reminds viewers they are watching elderly actors playing middle-aged versions of themselves. This meta-textual layer adds poignancy to every scene of violence and bravado, as audiences cannot help but think forward to the diminished men these characters will become. The technology does not merely allow Scorsese to tell a multi-decade story; it underscores the film’s central preoccupation with time’s passage.
- The film spans approximately 1949 to 2000, covering over fifty years of American history through one man’s criminal involvement
- Unlike “Goodfellas” or “Casino,” there are no glamorous montages celebrating the gangster lifestyle; instead, the film emphasizes routine, obligation, and moral compromise
- Frank’s physical decline mirrors his spiritual emptiness, culminating in scenes of profound isolation that counter the camaraderie shown earlier in the narrative
The Irishman’s Exploration of Loyalty, Betrayal, and Moral Compromise
At the heart of “The Irishman” lies Frank Sheeran’s relationship with two very different father figures: Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci), the quietly menacing crime boss who becomes Frank’s mentor, and Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino), the fiery Teamsters president who becomes his closest friend. Frank’s position between these two men creates the film’s central dramatic tension, as his loyalty to Russell eventually requires him to betray Jimmy in the most permanent way possible. This triangle structure allows Scorsese to examine how institutional loyalty can supersede personal bonds, even when those bonds appear unbreakable.
Joe Pesci’s performance as Russell Bufalino represents a dramatic departure from his Oscar-winning work in “Goodfellas” and “Casino.” Where Tommy DeVito and Nicky Santoro were volatile and explosive, Russell is measured, soft-spoken, and all the more terrifying for his restraint. When Russell tells Frank that “it’s what it is,” regarding the order to kill Hoffa, Pesci delivers the line with a weary resignation that suggests even he takes no pleasure in the necessity. This quiet menace makes Russell one of Scorsese’s most chilling creations, a man who has made peace with evil by treating it as simply part of doing business.
- Al Pacino’s Jimmy Hoffa is portrayed as genuinely charismatic but fatally unable to recognize when the world has changed around him
- The film suggests that Hoffa’s murder was less about any single offense than about his refusal to accept diminished status
- Frank’s willingness to kill his friend demonstrates the ultimate corruption of his soul, a point the film returns to repeatedly in its final act
How Scorsese Uses Time and Mortality to Subvert Genre Expectations
One of “The Irishman’s” most striking formal choices is its use of title cards that announce the future deaths of characters as they appear on screen. When a mobster walks into a room, text often appears noting his name and how he will eventually be killed: “shot in the face,” “found in a trunk,” “disappeared.” This technique serves multiple purposes. It reminds viewers that the violence depicted has real consequences, it undercuts any temptation to romanticize the lifestyle, and it creates a pervasive sense of doom that hangs over even the film’s lighter moments.
The final hour of the film dedicates itself almost entirely to the aftermath of Frank’s choices. Unlike traditional gangster narratives that might end with a climactic shootout or arrest, “The Irishman” follows Frank into old age, showing him alone in a nursing home, estranged from his surviving daughters, and unable to feel genuine remorse for his actions. His daughter Peggy (Anna Paquin), who speaks barely a dozen words throughout the film, communicates through her silence a judgment more devastating than any verbal condemnation could provide. Her refusal to engage with her father represents the moral center of the film, a witness who saw everything and chose to say nothing except through her absence.
- The film’s runtime of 209 minutes is essential to its effect, as the slow accumulation of detail creates investment in characters whose fates are preordained
- Scorsese deliberately avoids the visual energy of his earlier crime films, employing a muted color palette and measured editing rhythms that reflect the characters’ advancing age
Understanding The Irishman’s Historical and Political Context
“The Irishman” situates its fictional narrative within documented American history, presenting Frank Sheeran’s account of Hoffa’s disappearance as factual while acknowledging through various means that absolute truth remains elusive. The film depicts the intersection of organized crime, labor unions, and political power in mid-twentieth-century America, suggesting that these institutions operated with a level of interconnection that respectable society preferred not to acknowledge. From Joe Kennedy’s alleged mob ties to the Bay of Pigs invasion’s reliance on mafia resources, the film presents a shadow history of American power.
The portrayal of Jimmy Hoffa deserves particular attention for its complexity. Rather than depicting him as either hero or villain, the film shows Hoffa as a man of genuine accomplishments who built the Teamsters into a powerful force for working-class Americans while simultaneously entangling the union with organized crime. Pacino plays Hoffa as someone who believes his own mythology, a man who cannot accept that his time has passed and that younger, more pragmatic criminals have no use for his ego. His insistence on principle, however corrupt those principles might be, ultimately costs him his life.
- The film includes real figures including Tony Pro (Stephen Graham), Angelo Bruno (Harvey Keitel), and various Kennedy administration officials
- Historical events like the Cuban Missile Crisis and Watergate appear as background elements that intersect with the characters’ criminal activities
- The film’s treatment of the Hoffa disappearance represents one of several competing theories about what actually happened on July 30, 1975
Technical Achievements and Controversies in The Irishman’s Production
The de-aging visual effects in “The Irishman” represented one of the most ambitious applications of the technology at the time of the film’s release. Industrial Light and Magic developed a new system called Flux that captured performances with three cameras simultaneously, allowing for digital modification without requiring actors to wear tracking markers on their faces. This approach preserved the naturalism of the performances while enabling the actors, all in their mid-seventies during production, to portray their characters across multiple decades. The technology cost approximately $50 million of the film’s budget and required hundreds of visual effects artists working for over two years.
Not all viewers found the de-aging successful. Critics pointed to a scene where a digitally younger Frank Sheeran beats a grocer on the street, noting that De Niro’s body movements retained the stiffness of a man in his seventies despite his face appearing decades younger. This disconnect between facial youth and physical age created moments of unintentional humor for some viewers, while others argued that this dissonance actually enhanced the film’s themes about the passage of time. The controversy sparked broader discussions about the appropriate use of de-aging technology in cinema and whether it represents the future of filmmaking or a uncanny-valley distraction.
- Principal photography lasted 108 days across multiple locations in New York, Pennsylvania, and Miami
- The film features over 300 scenes and approximately 1,600 visual effects shots
- Netflix’s investment in the film represented part of the streaming service’s strategy to attract prestige filmmakers with budgets that traditional studios would not approve
The Irishman’s Place in Martin Scorsese’s Filmography and Legacy
“The Irishman” functions as a culmination of themes Scorsese has explored throughout his fifty-year career while also serving as a potential final statement in his examination of American crime. The film echoes “Mean Streets,” “Goodfellas,” and “Casino” in its focus on Italian-American organized crime, Catholic guilt, and the seductive nature of violence, but it views these familiar subjects through the lens of mortality in ways the earlier films could not. Where the young Scorsese of “Mean Streets” seemed fascinated by the energy of criminal life, the eighty-year-old director of “The Irishman” is preoccupied with its emptiness.
The film earned ten Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, though it won none, losing primarily to “Parasite” in most major categories. This shutout sparked discussions about the Academy’s relationship with Netflix productions and whether the film’s streaming distribution affected voter perception. Regardless of awards, “The Irishman” has already secured its place as a significant work in American cinema, a film that future generations will study both for its technical innovations and its profound thematic concerns. It stands as evidence that Scorsese, even in his ninth decade, remains capable of creating essential cinema.
How to Prepare
- **Set aside adequate time without interruption.** The film runs three hours and twenty-nine minutes, and while Netflix allows pausing, the cumulative effect works best when viewed in one sitting or, at most, two sessions. Breaking the film into smaller chunks diminishes its power to immerse viewers in the passage of time, which is central to its emotional impact.
- **Familiarize yourself with the basic historical context.** Understanding who Jimmy Hoffa was, what the Teamsters represented in mid-century America, and the general landscape of organized crime will enrich your viewing. The film provides context but moves quickly through decades of history, assuming some baseline knowledge from its audience.
- **Watch or revisit Scorsese’s earlier crime films.** “Goodfellas” (1990) and “Casino” (1995) provide essential context for understanding how “The Irishman” both extends and subverts the director’s previous work. Noticing the differences in tone, pacing, and moral perspective between these films and “The Irishman” reveals how deliberately Scorsese constructed this late-career meditation.
- **Read about the de-aging technology beforehand.** Knowing how the effects were achieved and their limitations may help you move past any initial distraction and focus on the performances, which are uniformly excellent despite occasional uncanny-valley moments.
- **Consider the film’s status as a potential unreliable narrative.** Frank Sheeran’s claims about killing Hoffa remain disputed by historians and investigators. Approaching the film as one man’s self-serving memory rather than documented history adds a layer of complexity to your interpretation.
How to Apply This
- **Pay attention to what characters do not say.** Peggy Sheeran’s silence throughout the film speaks louder than any dialogue. Notice how Scorsese uses restraint and withholding to communicate moral judgment, and consider how this technique might apply to other narrative forms you consume or create.
- **Track the film’s use of rituals and repetition.** From the recurring trips to award ceremonies to the repeated rhythms of violence and its aftermath, the film builds meaning through accumulation. This structural approach offers lessons for understanding how long-form narratives create emotional resonance.
- **Compare the film to its source material and historical record.** Charles Brandt’s book “I Heard You Paint Houses” provides additional detail about Sheeran’s claims, while investigative reporting offers competing theories about Hoffa’s death. Engaging with these sources deepens understanding of how the film navigates fact and fiction.
- **Discuss the film with others who have seen it.** “The Irishman” rewards conversation, as different viewers often focus on different aspects of its sprawling narrative. Comparing interpretations can reveal meanings you might have missed and clarify your own response to its themes of aging and regret.
Expert Tips
- **Watch the final thirty minutes as its own short film.** The nursing home sequences function almost independently from the rest of the narrative, and viewing them as a standalone meditation on mortality highlights Scorsese’s formal ambitions and the devastating emotional payoff of the preceding three hours.
- **Notice how silence replaces violence in the film’s second half.** Earlier Scorsese films often culminate in explosive confrontations, but “The Irishman” builds toward increasingly quiet scenes. This structural inversion reinforces the theme that the worst violence is often the absence of human connection.
- **Pay attention to doorways and thresholds.** Scorsese consistently frames Frank in doorways, particularly in scenes with his daughter Peggy. This visual motif emphasizes his inability to enter the moral space his family occupies, suggesting that his crimes have literally placed him outside normal human relationships.
- **Consider the film as a response to criticism of Scorsese’s earlier work.** Some critics accused “Goodfellas” and “Casino” of glamorizing violence and criminal life. “The Irishman” can be read as Scorsese’s answer to these criticisms, showing the same world stripped of glamour and revealed as spiritually bankrupt.
- **Revisit the film after some time has passed.** Like its protagonist looking back on his life, “The Irishman” reveals different aspects on subsequent viewings. The film practically demands rewatching, as early scenes accrue new meaning once you know where the story ends.
Conclusion
“The Irishman” stands as one of the most significant American films of the twenty-first century, a work that uses the gangster genre as a vehicle for profound meditation on aging, regret, and the consequences of moral compromise. Martin Scorsese, working with collaborators he has known for decades, crafted a film that feels both like a summation of his career-long concerns and a genuinely new artistic statement. The performances by De Niro, Pacino, and Pesci rank among the finest of their legendary careers, made more poignant by the visible toll that time has taken on these actors who once embodied youthful vitality in earlier Scorsese classics.
The film’s ultimate achievement lies in its willingness to follow its characters into diminishment and isolation, refusing the genre’s typical escape routes of tragic martyrdom or ironic triumph. Frank Sheeran ends the film alone, unable to feel genuine remorse yet aware that his choices have cost him everything that might have given his life meaning. This portrait of spiritual emptiness challenges viewers to consider the costs of complicity and silence in their own lives, making “The Irishman” not just a great gangster film but a great work of moral inquiry. For anyone interested in American cinema, the gangster genre, or the art of storytelling itself, engaging deeply with this film rewards the considerable investment of time and attention it demands.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it typically take to see results?
Results vary depending on individual circumstances, but most people begin to see meaningful progress within 4-8 weeks of consistent effort.
Is this approach suitable for beginners?
Yes, this approach works well for beginners when implemented gradually. Starting with the fundamentals leads to better long-term results.
What are the most common mistakes to avoid?
The most common mistakes include rushing the process, skipping foundational steps, and failing to track progress.
How can I measure my progress effectively?
Set specific, measurable goals at the outset and track relevant metrics regularly. Keep a journal to document your journey.
