Review of Promising Young Woman (2020): Revenge and Justice

The review of Promising Young Woman (2020) demands careful consideration of how revenge and justice intertwine in contemporary cinema, as Emerald...

The review of Promising Young Woman (2020) demands careful consideration of how revenge and justice intertwine in contemporary cinema, as Emerald Fennell’s directorial debut arrived as one of the most provocative and culturally resonant films of its era. Released in a landscape already charged with conversations about sexual assault, consent, and institutional failure following the Me Too movement, this candy-colored thriller defied expectations at every turn. The film earned five Academy Award nominations and won Best Original Screenplay, cementing its place as a landmark work that refuses easy categorization or comfortable conclusions. Promising Young Woman follows Cassie Thomas, played with devastating precision by Carey Mulligan, a former medical student whose life was derailed by a tragedy involving her best friend Nina. By night, Cassie frequents bars pretending to be dangerously intoxicated, confronting the men who attempt to take advantage of her vulnerability.

This premise alone raises profound questions about vigilante justice, the failures of legal systems to address sexual violence, and the psychological cost of carrying trauma. The film does not offer simple answers but instead forces viewers to sit with discomfort, challenging assumptions about victimhood, complicity, and what constitutes meaningful accountability. By the end of this analysis, readers will gain deeper insight into how Promising Young Woman subverts genre conventions, examines systemic failures that enable assault, and provokes essential conversations about the nature of revenge versus justice. The film’s deliberate choices”from its pastel aesthetics to its devastating finale”all serve a larger purpose that rewards close examination. Understanding these elements transforms a single viewing into a richer appreciation of what Fennell accomplished.

Table of Contents

What Makes the Revenge Narrative in Promising Young Woman Different from Traditional Thriller Films?

Traditional revenge thrillers typically follow a predictable arc: a wrong is committed, the protagonist arms themselves (often literally), and violent retribution ensues with cathartic satisfaction for the audience. Promising Young Woman systematically dismantles these expectations. Cassie does not physically harm her targets. Her weapons are clarity, confrontation, and the uncomfortable mirror she holds up to men who rationalize predatory behavior.

This approach reflects a more psychologically realistic portrayal of how trauma survivors often process their pain”not through explosive violence but through persistent, consuming focus on accountability. The film also distinguishes itself by refusing to sexualize its protagonist or frame her actions through a male gaze. Where other revenge films might feature their heroines in revealing outfits as part of the “trap,” Fennell keeps the camera focused on faces, on reactions, on the discomfort of men suddenly confronted with consequences. Cassie’s costumes during her nocturnal activities are deliberately unglamorous”she dresses to appear vulnerable, not desirable. This choice underscores that sexual assault is about power, not attraction, and that predators target perceived weakness.

  • The revenge operates through psychological confrontation rather than physical violence
  • Cassie’s methods expose the rationalizations people use to dismiss assault
  • The film critiques systems (universities, law enforcement, social circles) rather than just individual villains
  • Each confrontation reveals how ordinary people become complicit through inaction
What Makes the Revenge Narrative in Promising Young Woman Different from Traditional Thriller Films?

Carey Mulligan’s Performance and Character Depth in Promising Young Woman

Carey Mulligan delivers a career-defining performance as Cassie, navigating the character’s grief, rage, and occasional glimpses of the person she might have been without trauma. her portrayal resists the “strong female character” cliché that often flattens complex women into one-dimensional fighters. Instead, Mulligan shows someone barely holding together, whose elaborate schemes mask a profound inability to move forward. The character exists in suspended animation, working a dead-end job at a coffee shop despite her obvious intelligence, living with her parents, and deflecting their worried attempts to help her engage with life again.

The performance carries particular weight in scenes requiring rapid emotional shifts. When Cassie encounters Ryan (Bo Burnham), a former classmate who seems genuinely decent, Mulligan conveys both genuine attraction and the wariness of someone who has seen too much to trust easily. These moments of potential happiness make her mission’s toll painfully visible. The audience watches someone sacrifice their chance at healing on the altar of justice for someone who cannot benefit from it directly.

  • Mulligan reportedly gained the role after the original casting fell through, bringing unexpected depth
  • The character’s exterior coldness masks overwhelming grief and survivor’s guilt
  • Physical choices (posture, movement, stillness) convey as much as dialogue
  • The performance earned Academy Award, BAFTA, and Critics Choice nominations
Promising Young Woman Awards & NominationsOscar Noms5BAFTA Noms6Critics Choice4Golden Globe2SAG Noms3Source: Academy of Motion Pictures

Emerald Fennell’s Directorial Vision and Visual Storytelling

First-time feature director Emerald Fennell crafted a visual language that deliberately clashes with the film’s dark subject matter. The production design features candy colors, string-light bedrooms, and a coffee shop that looks like a Pinterest board come to life. This aesthetic dissonance serves multiple purposes: it reflects the feminine spaces often dismissed as trivial, creates an unsettling tonal tension that keeps viewers off-balance, and subverts the grimy visual palette typical of revenge narratives. The world looks sweet while something rotten lurks beneath.

Fennell’s screenplay demonstrates similar precision, layering dark humor throughout without undermining the serious themes. Cassie’s exchanges with her coffee shop boss (played by Laverne Cox) provide genuine laughs, while her parents’ well-meaning but slightly clueless concern adds warmth. These lighter moments make the darker scenes hit harder by contrast. The director understood that unrelenting grimness would numb audiences, while tonal variety keeps them emotionally engaged and vulnerable to the film’s devastating punches.

  • The color palette uses pinks, blues, and pastels traditionally coded as non-threatening
  • Music choices include ironic pop songs that comment on the action
  • Fennell’s background as an actress informed her ability to draw nuanced performances
  • The film cost approximately $10 million, modest for its eventual impact
Emerald Fennell's Directorial Vision and Visual Storytelling

How Promising Young Woman Addresses Justice System Failures in Sexual Assault Cases

The film methodically catalogs how institutional systems fail survivors of sexual assault. When Cassie approaches the university dean who dismissed Nina’s case, Madison McPhee (Connie Britton) offers hollow sympathy while defending her decision to protect “both sides” and the accused’s future. This scene encapsulates how institutions prioritize reputation and the prospects of perpetrators over victims seeking accountability. Statistics support this portrayal: according to RAINN, out of every 1,000 sexual assaults, only 310 are reported to police, and only 25 result in incarceration.

Cassie’s interactions with former classmates reveal another layer of complicity. Madison (Alison Brie), a friend who abandoned Nina when she needed support, has rewritten history to cast herself as a helpless bystander. The lawyer who destroyed Nina’s credibility during legal proceedings now presents himself as a reformed family man. Throughout, the film shows how communities protect their own, how witnesses become bystanders, and how time allows perpetrators to rebrand as “good guys” whose mistakes should not define them. This cycle of minimization, forgetting, and rehabilitation”afforded to assailants but rarely survivors”forms the structural injustice Cassie battles.

  • The dean character represents institutional self-protection over survivor support
  • Former friends’ reactions show how social pressure silences victims
  • The legal system appears briefly but memorably as another failed avenue
  • The film suggests that informal social accountability sometimes matters more than formal justice

The Controversial Ending and Its Statement on Revenge and Justice

The film’s final act generated significant debate, as Cassie’s ultimate plan leads to devastating consequences that subvert revenge-fantasy satisfaction. Without detailing specific plot points, the conclusion forces audiences to confront uncomfortable questions about what justice actually looks like when systems fail. The ending refuses catharsis in any traditional sense, instead leaving viewers with the bitter recognition that accountability, when it finally arrives, often comes at unbearable cost. This choice distinguished the film from genre predecessors that allow audiences to leave feeling vindicated.

Critics and audiences split on whether this conclusion represented a brave artistic statement or a troubling message about women’s expendability. Fennell has discussed her intentional decision to avoid the “empowering” ending that might have felt satisfying but false. The film argues implicitly that the systems designed to deliver justice are so thoroughly broken that working within them, or even around them, may prove impossible. This bleak assessment mirrors real-world cases where survivors achieve some measure of accountability only after years of struggle and tremendous personal sacrifice.

  • The ending avoids easy catharsis in favor of uncomfortable ambiguity
  • Final scenes generated significant critical and audience debate
  • Fennell chose realism over fantasy in depicting systemic limitations
  • The conclusion forces viewers to question their own expectations of revenge narratives
The Controversial Ending and Its Statement on Revenge and Justice

Cultural Impact and Legacy of Promising Young Woman

Released during the continued cultural reckoning with sexual violence in the entertainment industry and beyond, Promising Young Woman arrived at a moment primed for its message. The film sparked conversations that extended far beyond typical movie reviews, appearing in discussions about consent education, bystander intervention, and institutional reform. Its success demonstrated audience appetite for challenging narratives that respect viewer intelligence rather than offering simplistic moral frameworks.

The film’s influence can be traced in subsequent works exploring similar themes with comparable tonal complexity. It proved that difficult subject matter could find commercial success without exploitation, earning over $30 million worldwide against its modest budget. More significantly, it demonstrated that women’s stories about trauma and agency could anchor mainstream productions rather than being relegated to independent cinema with limited distribution.

How to Prepare

  1. Consider the cultural moment of its release”following years of Me Too revelations, during conversations about Brock Turner, Harvey Weinstein, and countless others whose cases dominated headlines. Understanding this context illuminates why the film resonated so deeply with audiences processing collective frustration with systemic failures.
  2. Recognize that the film deliberately subverts expectations”if you anticipate a typical revenge thriller, the tonal and narrative choices may feel jarring rather than intentional. Knowing that Fennell designed every “off” moment purposefully allows appreciation of the craft involved.
  3. Prepare for discomfort rather than catharsis”the film does not offer easy emotional resolution. Audiences seeking triumphant revenge fantasy may find the experience challenging, while those open to complexity will discover layers that reward contemplation.
  4. Note the deliberate casting choices”many male characters are played by actors known for likeable roles (Bo Burnham, Adam Brody, Christopher Mintz-Plasse), subverting audience assumptions about what predators “look like.”
  5. Consider watching with discussion partners”the film provokes conversation and benefits from processing its themes with others who can offer different perspectives.

How to Apply This

  1. Use the film as a starting point for conversations about consent, bystander intervention, and institutional accountability”its scenarios provide concrete examples that can ground abstract discussions.
  2. Apply the critical lens Fennell uses to examine media representations of sexual assault”notice how other films handle similar subject matter and what assumptions they reinforce or challenge.
  3. Consider what “justice” means when legal systems fail”the film prompts reflection on alternative forms of accountability and their limitations.
  4. Recognize complicity patterns in your own communities”the film’s most uncomfortable moments involve not perpetrators but people who looked away, minimized, or forgot. Identifying these patterns enables active resistance.

Expert Tips

  • Pay attention to background details during Cassie’s coffee shop scenes”the film plants visual information that rewards multiple viewings.
  • Notice how the soundtrack creates ironic commentary”song choices often contrast sharply with on-screen events, deepening the thematic resonance.
  • Watch for Cassie’s changing costumes and makeup as indicators of her psychological state”the visual transformation throughout the film charts her internal journey.
  • The film’s use of color is systematic rather than decorative”tracking the color palette reveals how Fennell signals danger and safety.
  • Consider each character’s name as potentially meaningful”Fennell reportedly chose names with deliberate symbolic weight.

Conclusion

Promising Young Woman stands as a defining film of its cultural moment, one that refused comfortable answers to impossible questions about revenge, justice, and the failures of systems meant to protect the vulnerable. Emerald Fennell created something rare: a genre film that functions as social commentary, a thriller that prioritizes character over action, and a revenge narrative that denies its audience the satisfaction revenge fantasies typically provide. This ambition, combined with Carey Mulligan’s unforgettable performance, produced a work that will continue generating discussion for years.

The film ultimately asks viewers to sit with discomfort rather than escape it, to recognize complicity rather than externalize blame onto obvious villains, and to question whether existing structures can ever deliver meaningful accountability. These are not pleasant questions, but they are necessary ones. For viewers willing to engage with challenging material that respects their intelligence, Promising Young Woman offers an experience that lingers long after the credits roll”not with satisfaction but with the productive disquiet that drives reflection and, potentially, change.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does it typically take to see results?

Results vary depending on individual circumstances, but most people begin to see meaningful progress within 4-8 weeks of consistent effort.

Is this approach suitable for beginners?

Yes, this approach works well for beginners when implemented gradually. Starting with the fundamentals leads to better long-term results.

What are the most common mistakes to avoid?

The most common mistakes include rushing the process, skipping foundational steps, and failing to track progress.

How can I measure my progress effectively?

Set specific, measurable goals at the outset and track relevant metrics regularly. Keep a journal to document your journey.


You Might Also Like