Taika Waititi’s *Jojo Rabbit* (2019) stands as one of the most audacious films of the decade, a review-worthy achievement that blends humor amidst darkness in ways that challenge, provoke, and ultimately move audiences. The film takes the seemingly impossible premise of a young Nazi boy whose imaginary friend is Adolf Hitler and transforms it into a profound meditation on love, hate, and the absurdity of fanaticism. This satirical comedy-drama arrived during a period of rising global nationalism, making its anti-hate message feel both timely and necessary. The film addresses fundamental questions about how societies manufacture hatred and how individuals, particularly children, become indoctrinated into ideologies of division.
By choosing satire over solemnity, Waititi taps into a long tradition of using comedy to confront fascism, dating back to Charlie Chaplin’s *The Great Dictator* (1940). *Jojo Rabbit* asks viewers to consider whether laughter can be a weapon against extremism, and whether empathy can survive even the most toxic environments of propaganda and fear. By the end of this comprehensive review, readers will understand the film’s artistic choices, its historical and cultural context, the performances that bring its characters to life, and the debates surrounding its unconventional approach to Holocaust-era storytelling. Whether you have already seen *Jojo Rabbit* or are considering watching it, this analysis will deepen your appreciation of how Waititi crafted a film that earned both an Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay and significant controversy for its satirical depiction of Nazi Germany.
Table of Contents
- What Makes Jojo Rabbit’s Dark Humor Work in a WWII Setting?
- Performances and Character Development in Jojo Rabbit
- Historical Context and Satirical Tradition in Anti-Fascist Cinema
- Analyzing the Visual Style and Production Design of Jojo Rabbit
- Controversial Reception and Critical Debates Around Jojo Rabbit
- The Source Material and Adaptation Choices
- How to Prepare
- How to Apply This
- Expert Tips
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Makes Jojo Rabbit’s Dark Humor Work in a WWII Setting?
The success of *Jojo Rabbit*’s dark humor hinges on Waititi’s understanding that satire must punch up, not down. The film never mocks the victims of Nazi atrocities; instead, it relentlessly ridicules the ideology, its adherents, and the machinery of propaganda that transformed ordinary Germans into participants in genocide. The Hitler portrayed by Waititi himself is a buffoon, a manifestation of a child’s misunderstanding rather than a rehabilitation of the historical figure. This imaginary Hitler speaks in simple terms, offers terrible advice, and ultimately represents the hollow promises of fascist ideology stripped of their power.
The humor operates on multiple levels simultaneously. Surface-level comedy comes from sight gags, physical humor, and the absurd situations characters find themselves in, such as a Hitler Youth training camp where children are taught to burn books and throw grenades with catastrophic incompetence. Deeper satirical layers emerge through the film’s critique of nationalism and conformity, showing how easily people adopt hateful beliefs when surrounded by social pressure and state propaganda. Several key elements enable this dark humor to function effectively:.
- **Perspective through innocence**: By filtering the Nazi regime through a ten-year-old’s eyes, the film exposes the absurdity of its ideology while protecting viewers from graphic depictions of violence
- **Tonal balance**: Waititi carefully calibrates shifts between comedy and tragedy, allowing moments of genuine emotion to land without undercutting them with jokes
- **Self-aware mockery**: The film acknowledges its own audacity, with characters like Rebel Wilson’s Fraulein Rahm delivering lines so ridiculous they highlight the stupidity of Nazi doctrine
Performances and Character Development in Jojo Rabbit
Roman Griffin Davis delivers a remarkable debut performance as Johannes “Jojo” Betzler, carrying the film with a portrayal that moves convincingly from fanatical Nazi youth to questioning adolescent to compassionate human being. His expressive face conveys the confusion of a child whose worldview is systematically dismantled, and he manages the difficult task of making audiences root for a protagonist initially introduced shouting Nazi slogans with genuine enthusiasm. Scarlett Johansson earned an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actress for her portrayal of Rosie Betzler, Jojo’s mother.
Her performance radiates warmth and subversive courage, as Rosie secretly hides a Jewish girl in their home while maintaining the facade of a loyal German citizen. The dance sequences she shares with her son, set to Beatles songs sung in German, provide some of the film’s most emotionally resonant moments. Johansson imbues Rosie with a determination to preserve her son’s humanity despite the poisonous environment surrounding him. The supporting cast elevates every scene they appear in:.
- **Thomasin McKenzie** as Elsa Korr brings depth and dignity to her role as the hidden Jewish teenager, refusing to be merely a symbol and instead portraying a young woman with her own fears, hopes, and sharp wit
- **Sam Rockwell** as Captain Klenzendorf creates a complex figure, a disillusioned German officer whose arc suggests not all participants in the Nazi regime were true believers
- **Alfie Allen and Rebel Wilson** provide comic relief while simultaneously embodying the banality of evil through their casual acceptance of horrific ideology
Historical Context and Satirical Tradition in Anti-Fascist Cinema
The question of whether such subject matter can be treated with humor remains contentious. Critics of this approach argue that comedy inherently trivializes genocide, that laughter creates distance when engagement is needed, and that historical trauma demands solemnity.
Defenders counter that satire has always been a weapon against tyranny, that reducing dictators to figures of ridicule strips them of mystique, and that emotional approaches vary in their effectiveness for different audiences. Waititi, who is of Maori and Jewish descent, has spoken about using humor as a tool of survival and resistance, noting that laughter does not preclude taking subjects seriously but rather offers an alternative pathway to understanding:.
- Jojo Rabbit* positions itself within a rich tradition of anti-fascist satire that stretches back to the early days of cinema. Charlie Chaplin’s *The Great Dictator* (1940) remains the most famous example, released when Hitler was still in power and delivering its plea for humanity directly to camera. Ernst Lubitsch’s *To Be or Not to Be* (1942) used theatrical farce to mock Nazi occupation in Poland, demonstrating that comedy could serve as resistance. More recently, Roberto Benigni’s *Life Is Beautiful* (1997) controversially set slapstick comedy against the backdrop of concentration camps, winning the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film while generating fierce debate.
- The film draws on Mel Brooks’ philosophy that mocking Hitler denies him the dignity of serious treatment
- Waititi’s comedic approach allows younger viewers to engage with difficult history through an accessible entry point
- The satire serves a pedagogical function, teaching about propaganda techniques by exposing their mechanisms
Analyzing the Visual Style and Production Design of Jojo Rabbit
Production designer Ra Vincent and the art department created a deliberately stylized version of Nazi Germany that reinforces the film’s satirical intent. The color palette is unexpectedly vibrant, with rich blues, reds, and greens that contrast sharply with typical gray-toned depictions of World War II. This aesthetic choice reflects Jojo’s perspective as a child who cannot yet comprehend the horror underlying the pageantry and symbolism surrounding him. The costumes, designed by Mayes C. Rubeo, similarly walk a line between historical accuracy and exaggerated parody.
Nazi uniforms appear both authentic and slightly absurd, with their excessive medals and rigid formality rendered as costume rather than authority. Rosie’s wardrobe, particularly her distinctive shoes with their red and white stripes, provides visual continuity that pays off in one of the film’s most devastating moments. The attention to period detail grounds the fantasy elements while the heightened styling maintains tonal consistency. Cinematographer Mihai Malaimare Jr. employs camera movement and framing that oscillates between whimsy and gravity:.
- **Symmetrical compositions** recall the work of Wes Anderson, creating an almost storybook quality that suits the child’s perspective
- **Handheld sequences** during moments of violence or emotional intensity break from the controlled aesthetic, jarring viewers into recognizing real stakes
- **Color grading shifts** subtly across the film’s runtime, growing more muted as Jojo’s worldview darkens and reality intrudes
Controversial Reception and Critical Debates Around Jojo Rabbit
The film premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2019, winning the prestigious People’s Choice Award, a prize often considered a reliable Oscar predictor. Critical response, however, proved sharply divided. Supporters praised Waititi’s bold approach and the film’s emotional resonance, while detractors questioned whether its satire succeeded or merely soft-pedaled Nazi ideology for entertainment purposes. Several recurring criticisms emerged in reviews and essays.
Some argued that the imaginary Hitler, however buffoonish, still gave screen time and personality to history’s greatest monster. Others felt the film sanitized the Nazi era by keeping violence largely offscreen and portraying several German characters sympathetically. The debate over whether *Jojo Rabbit* effectively critiques fascism or inadvertently normalizes it continues in academic and critical circles. The film’s awards trajectory reflected this divisiveness:.
- It won the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, recognizing Waititi’s work translating Christine Leunens’ novel *Caging Skies*
- Nominations for Best Picture and Best Supporting Actress generated controversy, with some viewing the recognition as validation and others as misjudgment
- International reception varied, with German audiences particularly split on an outsider’s comedic treatment of their national trauma
The Source Material and Adaptation Choices
Waititi adapted *Jojo Rabbit* from Christine Leunens’ 2008 novel *Caging Skies*, though the film diverges significantly from its source. The novel is darker and more psychologically complex, lacking the imaginary Hitler conceit entirely and following Jojo into adulthood with disturbing consequences. Where Leunens wrote a literary examination of obsession and self-deception, Waititi crafted a coming-of-age fable about choosing love over hate.
The most significant addition is Hitler as imaginary friend, a concept Waititi developed independently. This framing device allowed the film to externalize Jojo’s internal conflict, giving physical form to the ideology he must ultimately reject. By playing the role himself, Waititi took ownership of the creative risk, ensuring that any criticism of the portrayal would be directed at his choices rather than allowing another actor to become associated with the role.
How to Prepare
- **Understand the historical context** by reviewing the basic timeline of Nazi Germany, the Hitler Youth organization, and the persecution of Jewish people. The film assumes familiarity with these events and gains power when viewers recognize what lies beneath its comedic surface.
- **Familiarize yourself with anti-fascist satire** by watching or reading about earlier works in the tradition. Even brief clips from *The Great Dictator* or *The Producers* help contextualize Waititi’s approach within an established artistic lineage.
- **Research Taika Waititi’s background** including his Jewish heritage, his previous work blending comedy with serious themes (*Boy*, *Hunt for the Wilderpeople*), and his stated intentions for the film. This context illuminates choices that might otherwise seem flippant.
- **Prepare for tonal shifts** by recognizing that the film deliberately oscillates between broad comedy and genuine tragedy. Resist the urge to categorize it as purely one or the other; the discomfort of genre uncertainty is intentional.
- **Consider watching with others** to process the experience collaboratively. *Jojo Rabbit* prompts discussion about how we discuss difficult history, the role of art in confronting extremism, and the ethics of representation.
How to Apply This
- **Analyze the propaganda techniques** depicted in the film and compare them to contemporary examples of political messaging. The Hitler Youth sequences demonstrate how regimes target children; consider how similar dynamics operate today.
- **Discuss the film’s ethical choices** with others who have seen it. Does imaginary Hitler work as satire? Does the film earn its emotional moments? Engaging with these questions deepens understanding regardless of conclusions reached.
- **Explore the referenced works** in the film’s soundtrack and visual style. The Beatles songs, the Rilke poetry, and the cinematic homages reward viewers who investigate their connections to the themes.
- **Apply the empathy lesson** to contemporary contexts. Jojo’s transformation occurs through sustained personal contact with someone his ideology taught him to hate. Consider how similar transformations might occur in present-day contexts of division.
Expert Tips
- **Pay attention to shoes** throughout the film. Waititi uses footwear as a recurring visual motif, establishing character through this detail and paying it off in a moment of devastating economy.
- **Watch for Rebel Wilson’s background actions** in her scenes. She often delivers additional jokes through physical comedy that rewards attentive viewers without distracting from main dialogue.
- **Notice the film’s treatment of Elsa** as a full character rather than a moral lesson. Her frustration, sarcasm, and eventual vulnerability make her transformation of Jojo believable because it occurs through genuine relationship rather than symbolic redemption.
- **Consider the ambiguity of Captain Klenzendorf’s arc** and what it suggests about complicity and resistance. Rockwell’s performance rewards multiple viewings as his character’s true nature gradually emerges.
- **Revisit the opening sequence** after finishing the film. The use of Beatles music and archival footage establishes thematic concerns that resonate differently with full context.
Conclusion
Whether viewers find *Jojo Rabbit* a triumph of humanist filmmaking or a well-intentioned misfire often depends on individual relationships with the subject matter and expectations about appropriate tone.
What remains beyond dispute is that the film takes genuine creative risks in service of an anti-hate message, that it features outstanding performances across its ensemble, and that it represents Taika Waititi’s most personal and ambitious work to date. For those willing to engage with its challenging blend of comedy and tragedy, *Jojo Rabbit* offers substantial rewards and ample material for reflection on how we remember, represent, and resist the darkest chapters of human history.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it typically take to see results?
Results vary depending on individual circumstances, but most people begin to see meaningful progress within 4-8 weeks of consistent effort.
Is this approach suitable for beginners?
Yes, this approach works well for beginners when implemented gradually. Starting with the fundamentals leads to better long-term results.
What are the most common mistakes to avoid?
The most common mistakes include rushing the process, skipping foundational steps, and failing to track progress.
How can I measure my progress effectively?
Set specific, measurable goals at the outset and track relevant metrics regularly. Keep a journal to document your journey.
